en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
| reply to TKJunkMail
Re: The same court will probably just shoot it down again
I expect some 'concessions' - i.e. Comcast 'can' have more than 30% 'if' they
a) offer a la carte programming
b) stop filtering/traffic shaping
c) offer indie access to their network (yeah, like that will happen)
d) offer better pricing
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA | What does any of this have to do with pay TV market share? Nothing. There is no reason that Comcast (or any pay TV provider) should be capped at 30% when viable pay TV competition exists nationwide. |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| True - they can open up the market beyond 30%, also, they'll have to remove their traffic shaping, as some may want to watch TV over the Internet. Competition of TV over broadband will become a reality.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA | Once gain, traffic shaping of your HSI connection has nothing to do with pay TV. Besides, you're still allowed to watch content over your HSI connection if you so desire. |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Since I don't have HSI, you're right.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA | So what's your concern again? |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | I have no real concerns, however, I do suspect that there will be concessions required for more than 30% market share by a cable CO.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
| reply to openbox9
said by openbox9  :What does any of this have to do with pay TV market share? Nothing. There is no reason that Comcast (or any pay TV provider) should be capped at 30% when viable pay TV competition exists nationwide. Um. Martin, (Wholly owned property of Big Telco, Inc)
Makes the logic easier to see.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) |
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA | reply to en102
Even if there are concessions, they'll ultimately be meaningless and Comcast will get what they're striving for. In the end, we waste time and tax dollars with added bureaucracy. |
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast
| reply to KrK
said by KrK :Makes the logic easier to see. Apparently not, because I still fail to see the link to pay TV market share. |
|
