Reviews:
 ·magicjack.com
1 edit | reply to rahvin112
Re: Client information said by rahvin112:The Bank's lawyers never served wikileaks, although they have now served someone completely unrelated to Wikileaks through EMAIL (not proper service in the US). It's been said the website is operated/owned in Bermuda(?) Service requirements don't apply.
said by rahvin112:That the dispute involves the whistle blower protection laws in the US that weren't even addressed. Neither do "whistle blower" protections.
If they want US protections they should reside and operate within the US. If they don't want US laws to apply, they shouldn't use a US-based web hosting company.
People usually operate off shore to evade US laws. So, it's a bit ironic that all of a sudden this topic is couched as if US laws apply, and their freedom of speech is being violated.
Mark |
