| good. keep it capped at 30%. We don't need a cable co version of att/bell. |
|
 PaladinSage of the light
join:2001-08-17
Chester, IL | It is kind of hypocritical. Martin wants at&t to have free reign but not Comcast.
I'm not saying either company is good, just ask why Martin is doing this. |
|
|
|
 BSD24Tier 4Premium
join:2008-04-30
Middleboro, MA
2 edits | reply to FastiBook
said by FastiBook:keep it capped at 30%. We don't need a cable co version of att/bell. Fastibook-
So, the FCC says AT&T and Verizon (a larger company than Comcast) doesn't have to abide by the Cable Operator cap of 30%, but forcing Comcast to abide by it, is fair??? Comcast is right to sue the FCC, and I hope they win. FCC always likes to make the worst decisions. I don't get why they wouldn't be challenged after they had recently gave Verizon the ok to not have to abide by the same rules as Comcast, even though they are a larger company as a whole.
Comcast deserves the right to compete with the telephone companies on a level playing field! |
|
