Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Major Artists May Sue RIAA » What we really meant . . .
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
about time »
« "excessive"? bit of editorializing here ...  
AuthorAll Replies


jbob
Reach Out and Touch Someone
Premium
join:2004-04-26
Little Rock, AR
·Comcast
·AT&T Southwest

reply to TKJunkMail
Re: What we really meant . . .

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

said by newview See Profile :

quote:
"the money has just been delayed due to the complexity of figuring out how to divvy it up"

Translation:
We haven't figured out a legal way to screw the artists completely and keep all the money for ourselves.
No. they don't know how to divvy up the money. The fines collected were not tied to music downloaded on specific artists. So, how do they decide who gets how much? No matter how they split it, some artists are going to feel they deserved a bigger piece of the money than other artists. I'd bet money that that is what is holding everything up.
Honestly I bet they don't care. They certainly have to know what songs were "Distributed"(I'll not use the word downloaded) otherwise they wouldn't be able to come up with a money value settlement to begin with. To begin with they can only attempt suits against song sharers who's artists were with RIAA which not all artists are. Thus some songs are off limits. I'll bet it has gotten to the point where they(RIAA) does not keep a database of who's songs where shared/settled thus negating the money split. The artists depend on the RIAA to help them but in actuality they are simply trying to line their own pockets. Many artists are already being screwed by the record labels as it is.

Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO
They should because if they had to take you to court for it they would have to have specific songs that you were distributing. The court rarely works on broad terms and with this it would certainly require specifics.
Forums » Major Artists May Sue RIAAabout time »
« "excessive"? bit of editorializing here ...  


Thursday, 26-Nov 10:20:15 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [106] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [104] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [85] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [68] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [49] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [34] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [32] Despite Billions In USF Fees, U.S. Libraries Lack Bandwidth
· [31] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
Most people now reading
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· Telemarketing Hell: Heather's back [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Fiber to the Premises [Comcast HSI]
· Road Runnner up to 50 mbps is ready ! [Road Runner]
· Came from FIOS to Comcast and.....I'm glad I did! [Comcast HSI]
· [Config] cisco asa 5505 with multiple outside IP addresses [Cisco]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]