<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>lucky me in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20106497</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:41:50 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:41:50 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>lucky me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20106497</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1115065"><b>amungus</b></A> : Well, I've got darn close to 10Mbps anyway :D  ...Could bump up to the turbo intarweb plan I suppose...<br>Still, downloading at 1.2MBps (yes, MegaBytes/sec) isn't bad!  That's the max anyway, most times speed settles down to around 900-1000KB/sec.<br><br>It really should be more widespread than that by then.  <br><br>Strange to see people out of town w/fiber but their internet speeds are still 1.5Mbps like DSL.  Someday I guess they could bump it up.<br><br>Heck, we should be aiming for that number of people at 100Mbps by then...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20106497</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:49:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
