Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Sonic.Net Builds Out Their Own Network » First place
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Will be a returning customer.... »
« Get LOS ALAMOS Going, The Numbers *will* be Interesting!  
AuthorAll Replies

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

reply to CylonRed
Re: First place

Are you talking about the USF slush fund?

I'm with you on the ROI for rolling out new infrastructure. That's why I question why some people expect companies that make that investment to open their lines to competitors when the cost to deploy and support the infrastructure is so large in the first place.

You said it earlier, but there is no easy answer for this. Nobody (including me as a taxpayer) wants to pay for infrastructure that will be shared amongst multiple competitors. Other options have less popularity, so the question becomes, do we need additional providers in the market, or are we currently heading in the right direction?


John Galt
Forward, March
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
·CenturyLink

said by openbox9 See Profile :

Nobody (including me as a taxpayer) wants to pay for infrastructure that will be shared amongst multiple competitors.
This is a ridiculous assertion. That is like saying that you want every trucking company to build their own roads for exclusively transporting their goods.

Perhaps you meant to say this:

Nobody (including me as a taxpayer) wants to pay for infrastructure that will NOT be shared amongst multiple competitors.

As other posters have pointed out, there is only so much ROW for these things...
--
A is A

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
Ok, let me rephrase. I'm all for a common infrastructure for any and all providers to provide service, as long as it can be paid for without additional tax dollars. Is that better?


John Galt
Forward, March
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
·CenturyLink

said by openbox9 See Profile :

Ok, let me rephrase. I'm all for a common infrastructure for any and all providers to provide service, as long as it can be paid for without additional tax dollars. Is that better?
What an "Election Day" answer...!

Are you runing for political offce perchance??


--
A is A

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
You didn't like my first answer, so I attempted to give you a more "politically correct" one
Forums » Sonic.Net Builds Out Their Own NetworkWill be a returning customer.... »
« Get LOS ALAMOS Going, The Numbers *will* be Interesting!  


Tuesday, 24-Nov 13:29:40 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [96] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [76] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [28] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [17] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [16] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [13] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
· [12] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [11] Time Warner Dallas Customers Get WiMax December 1
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· Climate Change Scandal Erupts After Email Hack. [Security]
· [Extreme Plus] Rumor: Extreme Plus and Ultimate Price Drops [Rogers]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· Firearms: Ammo question. [General Questions]
· [ Classes] 3.2.2 Rogue [World of Warcraft]
· Just curious Routers, [Security]
· Thermostat upgrade to digital/programmable [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Audiences CRTC : Quebecor a plaidé ... [Videotron]