 John GaltForward, MarchPremium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
kudos:3 | reply to openbox9
Re: First place said by openbox9:Nobody (including me as a taxpayer) wants to pay for infrastructure that will be shared amongst multiple competitors. This is a ridiculous assertion. That is like saying that you want every trucking company to build their own roads for exclusively transporting their goods.
Perhaps you meant to say this:
Nobody (including me as a taxpayer) wants to pay for infrastructure that will NOT be shared amongst multiple competitors.
As other posters have pointed out, there is only so much ROW for these things...
--
A is A |
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2 | Ok, let me rephrase. I'm all for a common infrastructure for any and all providers to provide service, as long as it can be paid for without additional tax dollars. Is that better? |
|
John GaltForward, MarchPremium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
kudos:3 | said by openbox9:Ok, let me rephrase. I'm all for a common infrastructure for any and all providers to provide service, as long as it can be paid for without additional tax dollars. Is that better? What an "Election Day" answer...!
Are you runing for political offce perchance?? 
--
A is A |
|
|
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2 | You didn't like my first answer, so I attempted to give you a more "politically correct" one |
|
