 JamesonPremium
join:2004-05-28
Fallbrook, CA
kudos:1 | reply to Alpine
Re: Good Compare U-Verse TV to FiOS TV and you will have your answer. |
|
| Poor comparison. This is a core build, not end user build. |
|
 AlpinePremium
join:2000-01-11
Atlanta, GA | My point exactly... There's more to a real network than home broadband connections. |
|
 morboComplete Your Transaction
join:2002-01-22
00000 | it's not difficult or unwise to extrapolate the quality of a network by the offerings of home broadband connections. my bet is that it's decent indicator. |
|
Cod
join:2000-07-05
Kernersville, NC | said by morbo:my bet is that it's decent indicator. I wouldn't bet the house... |
|
|
|
EPS
join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA | reply to morbo
said by morbo:it's not difficult or unwise to extrapolate the quality of a network by the offerings of home broadband connections. my bet is that it's decent indicator. AT&T's worldwide network is former AT&T ("the old" AT&T) IIRC, while their broadband is the old SBC/BellSouth- probably not the best metric there. |
|
JamesonPremium
join:2004-05-28
Fallbrook, CA
kudos:1 | reply to wolverine_99
said by wolverine_99:Poor comparison. This is a core build, not end user build. How? With U-Verse, I believe that you can only be watching HD quality programming on one TV at a time..where as FiOS that is not the case. You can infer one of two things:
a) Their network cannot support the load.
b) They are bandwidth nazis
If "a" is not the answer and you know why they only allow HD programming on one TV please let me know.
--
Sprint EVDO| 3.2GHZ Intel | BFG GF 6800 OC | Win XP Pro SP2/98SE/ Macbook Pro OS X Tiger | PCs connected via Linksys WRT54G | DD-WRT firmware: DD-WRT v24 Beta (01/18/07) std |
|
