BF69
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN
| Re: Nobody pays for music said by bjack  :Please, i don't know of any friend that has paid for music if they can get it for free Then they are cheap and need to ask the manager at Burger King for a raise. Seriously artists have a right to SOME compensation. WTF is wrong with people? If Amazon reduced it's price of DRM free MP3s to 19¢, people would still find an excuse to steal. Frankly if you don't think a song you are going to listen to hundreds maybe even thousands of times over the years is worth 99¢ then it's not really worth owning in the first place.
This whole "The music sucks so it should be free." line I hear from some people doesn't even make sense. If something sucks why do you even want it even if it's free? If I gave you a dog crap sandwich would you eat it just because it was free? | |
|
 
MIRV
join:2000-12-01
Louisville, KY | Re: Nobody pays for music It's just economics. Why would you pay for something you can get for free? | |
|
 | 
fractalman93
Progressive Music Fan
Premium
join:2004-08-02
Newport News, VA | Re: Nobody pays for music To show your @%$#ing support for the musicians!! | |
|
| | |
| bigskank
join:2002-06-07
Norman, OK
| said by MIRV :It's just economics. Why would you pay for something you can get for free? Makes perfect since. That's why the bottled water market is doing so badly. I mean, who would pay $3.00 for something they can turn on their tap and get for next to nothing.
Oh, wait... | |
|
| | 
Tzale
Proud Libertarian Conservative
Premium
join:2004-01-06
Sweden
 ·Verizon FIOS
 ·Optimum Online
| Re: Nobody pays for music said by bigskank :said by MIRV :It's just economics. Why would you pay for something you can get for free? Makes perfect since. That's why the bottled water market is doing so badly. I mean, who would pay $3.00 for something they can turn on their tap and get for next to nothing. Oh, wait... You can buy bottled water for $0.05 if you buy it in 24-36 pack cases...  And clearly SPRING water IS superior in taste to tap water which has a chlorine taste to it. Not all bottled water is spring water.
-Tzale | |
|
| | | 
Water
@oshean.org | Re: Nobody pays for music And not all tap water is chlorinated or city water. | |
|
| | | |
Tzale
Proud Libertarian Conservative
Premium
join:2004-01-06
Sweden
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online
| Re: Nobody pays for music said by Water :
And not all tap water is chlorinated or city water.
Well I'm talking from my perspective and most people's perspectives who can't stand the taste of tap water... If you get your water from a well, then maybe it isn't... But that is an exception, and even then there might be a distinct mineral taste. And not to mention sometimes bottled water is just "convenient."
-Tzale
--
Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not real conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 »www.usconstitution.net/const.html
| |
|
| GPSrob
join:2007-05-21
| Because you obviously don't get the same thing.
Buying it indicates that it has value to you and in participating in the trade of money for goods you know you're contributing to the welfare of the person that made something you enjoy. Particularly in this direct method when 100% of the revenue hits the original artist who then pays his costs of business as opposed to the other way around when the artist gets paid last and mostly screwed which is actually a disincentive to buy it in the traditional method. | |
|
| 
C_
Kill The Socialists
Premium
join:2001-03-19
| said by MIRV :It's just economics. Why would you pay for something you can get for free? 500,000 of that was most likely trent buying his own crap under a guise
--
"and no matter how drunk you get .. don't lick the wall socket to test polarity..." | |
|
| | maxpower
join:2006-10-09
Providence, RI | Re: Nobody pays for music quote:
500,000 of that was most likely trent buying his own crap under a guise
Proof? | |
|
| | 
Armaina
Not every saint is a fool
Premium
join:2002-11-06
Tempe, AZ | said by ,000 of that was most likely trent buying his own crap under a guise
[/BQUOTE :
And what exactly would be the point of that? | |
|
| | | Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA
| Re: Nobody pays for music said by Armaina :And what exactly would be the point of that? e-Peen contests, duh. 
Honestly, no...I can't even really make up a good reason why he'd inflate his own figures. | |
|
| |
| rahvin112
join:2002-05-24
Sandy, UT
| Because of morals and knowing that you aren't entitled to the work of others for free.
Although you might not have any morals and your friends might not either, there are a significant number of people in this country that are honest and want to pay a fair price for their entertainment. Maybe when you are a little older you will understand that if no one pays anyone else for their work there is NO economy. Every exchange of money creates jobs and if everyone was like you there would be no jobs. | |
|
| 
CylonRed
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-06
Bloom County
| I could probably get most, if not all, of the songs I want for free if I want mp3 (which I don't really want) but I still buy cd's - not a ton but when someone wants to get me a gift then I ask for money for music.
I don't like current music so most of the stuff I buy is older (classic/progressive rock) - guys who wrote the vast majority of their songs (music and lyrics). I have no issues with buying CD's - although I would have no issues with buying the CD directly from the band.
I know many others who prefer cd's as well - they have huge collections and most could probably be gotten for free. | |
|
|
Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA
| said by BF69 :This whole "The music sucks so it should be free." line I hear from some people doesn't even make sense. *shrugs* The line with me is "the music sucks, so I don't buy it". I may P2P to determine the rate/amount of suck, but in the end, if the music sucks out loud, it all gets thrown off my players, computer, everything. | |
|
Pirate515
Premium
join:2001-01-22
Brooklyn, NY
| said by BF69 :If Amazon reduced its price of DRM-free MP3s to 19¢, people would still find an excuse to steal. True, but IMO the number of people stealing at that price will drammatically increase while the number of people buying music legitimately will increase.
There is a category of people out there who refuse to pay for anything no matter how cheap it is. This is not the category that the music industry should be focusing on. Even if RIAA manages to shut down all the channels via which these people steal, what have they really accomplished for the artists? IMO absolutely nothing. If these people can no longer steal, it doesn't mean that they will go out and start buying music instead. They will simply do without. So RIAA would have simply wasted their time, efforts and money while giving their members absolutely nothing in return.
Another group are hardcore fans. These guys will pretty much buy everything their favorite band(s) put(s) out, no matter how much the cost. No need to focus on these either, as you will be preaching to the choir.
On the other hand, let's focus on the working class category. These are the people who have some money to spend on entertainment and some free time on their hands. Now, if the music they want costs an arm and a leg and comes with restrictions, for some it might be worth the time, efforts and risks associated with trying to steal it. However, lower the price to a reasonable level, and trying to steal it becomes pointless for many. If for a small amount of money you can get the real deal, not have to worry about getting caught and use your time for something more interesting, than why bother stealing it? That is the group that I think the music industry should be focusing on. Again, you can't totally rid the world of piracy, but you can minimize to the point that it becomes insignificant.
--
Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies...
A MESSAGE to the RIAA and the MPAA: You shouldn't wound what you can't kill... | |
|
| 
C0deZer0
Oc'D To Rhythm And Police
Premium
join:2001-10-03
Davenport, FL | Re: Nobody pays for music Except we're talking about RIAA. and you're assuming anyone there has any common sense. | |
|
Tzale
Proud Libertarian Conservative
Premium
join:2004-01-06
Sweden
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online
| said by BF69 :said by bjack :Please, i don't know of any friend that has paid for music if they can get it for free Then they are cheap and need to ask the manager at Burger King for a raise. Seriously artists have a right to SOME compensation. WTF is wrong with people? If Amazon reduced it's price of DRM free MP3s to 19¢, people would still find an excuse to steal. Frankly if you don't think a song you are going to listen to hundreds maybe even thousands of times over the years is worth 99¢ then it's not really worth owning in the first place. This whole "The music sucks so it should be free." line I hear from some people doesn't even make sense. If something sucks why do you even want it even if it's free? If I gave you a dog crap sandwich would you eat it just because it was free? Well said... And I'm behind the P2P Revolution, when there is an ARGUMENT to be behind it... When groups set their prices low like this, then obviously I'm not going to side with some loser who thinks everything should be free!
They're the same people who think that me sitting down and coding an application in C++ for a year or two isn't worth $19.99!
-Tzale | |
|
|
|
|
·
·