PDXPLT
join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR | reply to kitsune
Re: DIA is owned by the public said by kitsune:They may very well have. But it doesn't have anything to do with this. There was no law passed in Colorado stating that they had to have this filter in place. You'd have a point if this was a private company; i.e., Starbucks offering a hotspot with censorship. But this is a government-provided service, one that is restricting what citizens may access. That makes it related, I think.
No wonder Europeans think we're all a bunch of repressed puritans. |
|
 ThalerPremium
join:2004-02-02
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:3
 ·DSL EXTREME
| said by PDXPLT:You'd have a point if this was a private company; i.e., Starbucks offering a hotspot with censorship. But this is a government-provided service, one that is restricting what citizens may access. That makes it related, I think. So the porn viewers can get the entire service scrapped for the other 99.9% of users? Fantastic. |
|
