 gimme5
join:2002-12-23
Kissimmee, FL | reply to Jairzinho
Re: If it's easy to break into your house, it's OK then? exactly |
|
| reply to Ahrenl
Re: Who Lives in a Web Site? said by Ahrenl:Horrible analogy. This is more like someone who left their TV playing on the street, and threatened to sue anyone who told people where to go and watch said TV. No property is being withheld from the original owner, who is ACTUALLY PROVIDING the content to anyone who wishes to ask for it. That is pretty much as close to the online situation as it gets. And the whole thing isn't even about coming and watching or anything else, but just telling other people about it, how is that a violation of anything? |
|
|
|
| reply to sporkme
MobiTV said they didn't want to take Howard's 'sight' down. When does the First Amendment not apply? When it goes against the DMCA? Can't Mobi, the artist, sue MobiTV? Or does Mobi own part of it? Who had the name Mobi first... maybe Mobi(the artist) will have to change his name?
--
HNS 7000S|G4R_1250MHz|ver. 5.6.1.19|Sig Strength: 79|Athlon X2 4200|WinXP Pro|WiFi Network |
|
| reply to MyDogHsFleas
Re: If it's easy to break into your house, it's OK then? It's like this. You took your stuff, and left it behind a WallMart. People came along and then took it. Nothing illegal, or immoral.....z |
|
| reply to sporkme
Re: Who Lives in a Web Site? LMAO. I noticed that. NOBODY knows how to spell anymore....z |
|
 lauraDomestic BlissPremium
join:2002-04-16
San Jose, CA | reply to BigMattock
said by BigMattock:MobiTV said they didn't want to take Howard's 'sight' down. When does the First Amendment not apply? When it goes against the DMCA? Can't Mobi, the artist, sue MobiTV? Or does Mobi own part of it? Who had the name Mobi first... maybe Mobi(the artist) will have to change his name? But his name's MOBY. not mobi. If it was mobi, maybe he'd have a case.
--
43 things |
|
