Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » MobiTV Threatens HowardForums Shutdown » If it's easy to break into your house, it's OK then?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Advertising Ploy  
AuthorAll Replies

RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
·XMission

reply to MyDogHsFleas
Re: If it's easy to break into your house, it's OK then?

said by MyDogHsFleas See Profile :

Seems like faulty logic to me.

"Sir, we are going to let the guy go who ransacked your house and stole all your stuff, because you didn't lock your back window. This is definitely your fault. Why did you even threaten him with prosecution? You have no right. In fact, we are going to release the information about your back window on the Internet, and make sarcastic remarks about how stupid you are."
Actually, your logic is more faulty. It is more like you left your full size, floor to ceiling, wall to wall picture window drapes open and then got upset because everyone standing on the street or side walk (and not on your lawn) saw you undressed doing actions of dubious morality with another guy for a blue film and they are not buying your film.

In your example you have nothing left, in the other you still have what you started with and the option to close the drapes and continue on with your business.

If you chose not to shut the drapes but instead to sue all the onlookers for staring at you from the public access areas, then I wonder how far you would get?
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.

MyDogHsFleas
Premium
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T Southwest

said by RayW See Profile :

Actually, your logic is more faulty. It is more like you left your full size, floor to ceiling, wall to wall picture window drapes open and then got upset because everyone standing on the street or side walk (and not on your lawn) saw you undressed doing actions of dubious morality with another guy for a blue film and they are not buying your film.
I'd say your analogy could stand a little tweaking. What it's really like is if I had the big drapes closed, but around the side of the house, there was an unmarked button. If you tried pushing the button, you'd find it opened the drapes and you could see what was going on. Then I came out and yelled at you for opening the drapes. Your defense is, "But the button is right over there! All I have to do is push it! If you didn't want your drapes open, you should have protected your button!" And then you wrote a story for the local paper telling people where the button is and how to press it.

In your example you have nothing left, in the other you still have what you started with and the option to close the drapes and continue on with your business.
But I really don't, because you've copied my blue film and posted it on the Internet. Where is my business now?

If you chose not to shut the drapes but instead to sue all the onlookers for staring at you from the public access areas, then I wonder how far you would get?
The thing you and others are missing is that the video streams are not really on public display. If someone goes through the front door of the mobitv site, there is no link that says "Hey! Click here and get it for free!" Instead, there's a signup process by which you are given access.

To bypass it, you have to know (a) the URL of a file and (b) how to download that file, save it, examine its contents, and copy/paste the imbedded URLs into a Web browser. We, as techno-elite people, know how to do those steps easily. I guarantee you that at least half of the people on the Internet would, given the URL, fail to download the file, examine it, and then view the videos. Additionally, the URL to the file is not obvious by any means. Someone figured it out and posted it.

C DM

join:2002-12-31


2 edits
said by MyDogHsFleas See Profile :

said by RayW See Profile :

Actually, your logic is more faulty. It is more like you left your full size, floor to ceiling, wall to wall picture window drapes open and then got upset because everyone standing on the street or side walk (and not on your lawn) saw you undressed doing actions of dubious morality with another guy for a blue film and they are not buying your film.
I'd say your analogy could stand a little tweaking. What it's really like is if I had the big drapes closed, but around the side of the house, there was an unmarked button. If you tried pushing the button, you'd find it opened the drapes and you could see what was going on. Then I came out and yelled at you for opening the drapes. Your defense is, "But the button is right over there! All I have to do is push it! If you didn't want your drapes open, you should have protected your button!" And then you wrote a story for the local paper telling people where the button is and how to press it.

In your example you have nothing left, in the other you still have what you started with and the option to close the drapes and continue on with your business.
But I really don't, because you've copied my blue film and posted it on the Internet. Where is my business now?

If you chose not to shut the drapes but instead to sue all the onlookers for staring at you from the public access areas, then I wonder how far you would get?
The thing you and others are missing is that the video streams are not really on public display. If someone goes through the front door of the mobitv site, there is no link that says "Hey! Click here and get it for free!" Instead, there's a signup process by which you are given access.

To bypass it, you have to know (a) the URL of a file and (b) how to download that file, save it, examine its contents, and copy/paste the imbedded URLs into a Web browser. We, as techno-elite people, know how to do those steps easily. I guarantee you that at least half of the people on the Internet would, given the URL, fail to download the file, examine it, and then view the videos. Additionally, the URL to the file is not obvious by any means. Someone figured it out and posted it.
Actually, there is no button or anything of the sort, the drapes are really already open, it's just that the house might be in a part of town that not a lot of people would go to, but if and when someone did and noticed the open drapes and stood there (from the public street, even if it's an out of the way street) and looked into the house through the already open drapes, and told others about it, there's absolutely nothing illegal that is happening on the part of that person or anyone else who comes to look into the house and/or tells others about it. There's no copying of anything that's taking place, it's just people coming and looking. Let's not try to twist it into something more than what it really is.


jgilm

@sysdyn.com

reply to MyDogHsFleas
I think all of the analogies have gotten way out of hand. The concept is rather simple.

Try to prosecuting HoFo for free speech is the issue. HoFo did not steal or infringe copyright on anything. The unprotected URL is a fact, which cannot be copyrighted.

I cannot copyright the fact that I place a spare key to my house under the big rock by the door. Neither can I expect to win at law against a person if they place signs around my neighborhood that tells where I put a spare key.

Regardless of the type of protection, it is not illegal to tell people a fact about the protection

It is illegal to do with someone elses "property" that which they do not want to have happen. HoFo did not do anything with anyone's property, just as the person that tells others where I put my spare key. If a person uses my spare key to enter my house, then they would be violating the law, just as if someone used the link to view TV streams that were not free.

Going after HoFo is stupid just for this reason alone. They cannot possibly win at law.

C DM

join:2002-12-31

said by jgilm :

I think all of the analogies have gotten way out of hand. The concept is rather simple.

Try to prosecuting HoFo for free speech is the issue. HoFo did not steal or infringe copyright on anything. The unprotected URL is a fact, which cannot be copyrighted.

I cannot copyright the fact that I place a spare key to my house under the big rock by the door. Neither can I expect to win at law against a person if they place signs around my neighborhood that tells where I put a spare key.

Regardless of the type of protection, it is not illegal to tell people a fact about the protection

It is illegal to do with someone elses "property" that which they do not want to have happen. HoFo did not do anything with anyone's property, just as the person that tells others where I put my spare key. If a person uses my spare key to enter my house, then they would be violating the law, just as if someone used the link to view TV streams that were not free.

Going after HoFo is stupid just for this reason alone. They cannot possibly win at law.
It's true, the only real thing in question is about posting URLs, which is perfectly legal and not copyrighted. On the other hand, torrent sites have gotten in trouble for simply putting up links too to things that aren't really hosted by them. It's different in this case though, since nothing at all is hosted on HoFo except the pages with the text and links (no files or anything like that that are used to access MobiTV).

RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
·XMission

reply to MyDogHsFleas
said by MyDogHsFleas See Profile :

I'd say your analogy could stand a little tweaking. What it's really like is if I had the big drapes closed, but around the side of the house, there was an unmarked button. If you tried pushing the button, you'd find it opened the drapes and you could see what was going on. Then I came out and yelled at you for opening the drapes. Your defense is, "But the button is right over there! All I have to do is push it! If you didn't want your drapes open, you should have protected your button!" And then you wrote a story for the local paper telling people where the button is and how to press it.

I specified they did not go on your property. The drapes symbolize the protection codes that are on smart web sites that are for pay. Now if they published the security codes (ie trespassed on your lawn to push the button to draw your drapes...novel concept there, an outdoor drape control for inside drapes...) then you would be correct.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.
Forums » MobiTV Threatens HowardForums Shutdown« Advertising Ploy  


Sunday, 29-Nov 07:30:42 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [73] Weekend Open Thread
· [72] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Blue Ray: Samsung BD-P3600 or LG BD390 [Audio/Video Chat]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· [Vista] Vista Media Center - DVR-MS vs. WTV [Microsoft Help]