Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » It's Apparently Sprint Rumor Friday » sprint screwed nextel
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


mindfrost82

join:2003-04-19
Cortland, IL

reply to baddealsemerge
Re: sprint screwed nextel

I'm sorry, but all of those people you say Nextel is having problems because of Sprint doesn't know what they're talking about. It has been all over the net that Nextel was at capacity and was starting to have major problems before Sprint was even in the picture. If Sprint didn't merge with them, they would have been run underground, especially with their rebanding they have to do on their entire network.


BillRoland
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Ocala, FL
clubs:
·Cox HSI

Well mindfrost82 See Profile, you might want to do some independent analysis yourself before you start trying to "educate" us. If you read NEXTEL's financials going into the merger, they were adding roughly 750,000 post-paid subscribers a quarter, had one of the lowest churn rates in the industry, and the highest ARPU of anybody. They were also adding 2,500+ cell sites a year (more than Sprint added in 2005 and 2006 combined). They were also posting some of the strongest, healthiest numbers of any wireless company. NEXTEL the company was not at capacity, they were actively building out new sites to expand the network and keep ahead of capacity, and they were also in the midst of introducing the 6:1 interconnect vocoder to deal with capacity problems when Sprint took over (which had well documented problems but which could have been worked out if Sprint had cared to).

Sprint slashed spending on the iDEN network and those capacity problems you mention did turn into a reality in short order. Its a lot easier to keep ahead of the demand than to fall 10 miles back and try and make it up. Sprint came in and decimated the NEXTEL brand, brought their lousy customer service, tried to kill off any innovative new NEXTEL handsets (they rolled out the i930 smartphone by also cutting off WiDEN, which was unnecessary anyway since it only used excess available bandwidth, making the phone useless), and just expected people to flock with arms open wide to the CDMA side. Unless you haven't noticed, they're flocking alright, away from Sprint totally. Indeed, the best thing they can do is spin it off, get Tim Donahue to run it, and bring NEXTEL back to its glory. It can be done, with proper management.
--
"Don't steal. The government hates competition."


joako
Premium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
·AT&T U-Verse

NEXTEL was at capacity and you should know because it was an issue in our area. The "solution" so to speak was 2:1 interconnect so I guess you could say technically the network wasn't at capacity but the price was every person you spoke to sounded like a robot and you sounded like one to them. Just not acceptable to me. Every time I went to Ashtin or those people in the yellow building off Pine Ave they'd look at it say the phone was fine and that it was the network, I was the x person that day to complain about it.

I think that they did what any company would do during a merger... why are you going to suddenly continue to sign tower colocation leases when you just merged with a company that might hold similar assets. Choosing a tower site is something done in the long term. You just don't setup on a tower and decide to move it a year later it makes no financial sense and those are usually long-term contracts. You are going to see, obviously, less expansion after a merger as the companies align themselves. You have so many overlapping resources that you need to eliminate or else you're never going to make a return on your investment. Remember, shareholders = #1.

I don't think Sprint would spin off Nextel. They have already made a significant investment and have pretty much integrated the companies. They are just about done merging billing systems into one. I am sure much has been done to combine the operations of the two networks... e.g.: shared switching equipment, transport lines, tower space. Once everything is integrated the way I see it to spin off Nextel would be to keep about the same operating costs and loosing revenue.

The main issue is Sprint's poor customer service and their reputation for the same. They seriously should fire everyone and start over. I'm not saying its the people answering the phones I just think Sprint doesn't train people well, if at all and doesn't put the right people working at the right places.
--
09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B:D8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0


mindfrost82

join:2003-04-19
Cortland, IL

I completely agree joako. As far as customer service, I worked as a Sprint Business Specialist II in a call center before the merger. The training was long and hard for a lot of people. There were a few of us that were way ahead of the rest of the class. You should have seen some of the people they hired though, I know why their customer service is poor. Once out on the floor it was all about numbers, like it is with most call centers. Honestly though, their old billing system was horrible and confusing to a lot of people.


joako
Premium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
·AT&T U-Verse

Saw this article... basically confirming my thoughts.

Sprint Says Splitting Up Would Be A Nightmare

By Crayton Harrison

March 12 (Bloomberg) -- Sprint Nextel Corp., the wireless carrier formed by the merger of Sprint Corp. and Nextel Communications Inc. in 2005, couldn't easily be split up again, Chief Network Officer Kathy Walker said.

Separating operations would take longer than the integration of Nextel, Walker said today at a Bear Stearns conference in Palm Beach, Florida. Sprint has trained technicians to work on both companies' technologies and has combined network-monitoring operations, she said.

About 1.2 million users canceled their contracts with Sprint last year, complaining about poor customer service and dropped calls. The former Nextel network made up about one-third of Sprint's customers at the end of last year, compared with about 40 percent when the companies combined.

``With everything we've done, it'd probably take longer to undo it,'' Walker said, responding to a question about what it would take to split up. ``Taking that integration plan and reverse-engineering it would be the way we would look at it.''

Sprint, the third-biggest U.S. mobile-phone service provider, fell 10 cents to $6.07 at 1:04 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares had dropped 53 percent this year before today.

While Sprint has integrated many of its operations with Nextel's, it still runs networks that don't overlap much, Walker said. Sprint, based in Overland Park, Kansas, has combined network technology in about one-tenth of its wireless sites, with the rest dedicated solely to one system or the other for logistical reasons such as space limitations, she said.

No Buyers

Selling the former Nextel network would be difficult because there are no buyers, Lehman Brothers analyst Thomas Seitz said last month in a research note.

``We cannot think of a scenario where someone would want to re-enter the market as a fifth national player and heat up what is already a very competitive market,'' said Seitz, who is based in Washington and expects Sprint shares to perform in line with the broader market.

Instead of breaking up the company or shutting down the Nextel network, Sprint should try to stem subscriber losses to boost its share price, Seitz said.

Sprint may detail spending plans for a new network called Xohm when the company reports first-quarter results, Kurt Fawkes, vice president for investor relations, said today. The network will offer faster Internet connections for applications such as music and video downloads.

The company scrapped an agreement last year with Clearwire Corp. to share costs to build a network that would have reached as many as 100 million people. Paul Saleh, who stepped down as chief financial officer in January, said in December that the company could spin off Xohm, seeking outside investors to reduce the cost of building it.

--
09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B:D8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0

BigUn71

join:2008-06-06
Liberty, MO

reply to BillRoland
Dude, you're AWESOME! My thoughts exactly, at first everybody thought it was the best idea in the universe that Nextel gave in to Sprint. I had Nextel for a while when I was installing cable T.V. I liked having the service, I also had a Sprint phone. After acquiring the Sprint service, I quickly found out how bad their service was, not only the wireless service, but, their CUSTOMER service. last year they were awarded the company to have the WORSE customer service in the country. Nextel really does need to break away from the Sprint devils. I am still stuck in my sprint contract, but they have been prettydecent lately.
Forums » It's Apparently Sprint Rumor Friday


Thursday, 26-Nov 19:58:30 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [107] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [69] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [61] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [45] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [37] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [34] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [34] Despite Billions In USF Fees, U.S. Libraries Lack Bandwidth
Most people now reading
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· IPComms Free DIDs now with sip registration maybe?? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· So we need a legitimate reason to use a lot of bandwidth? [TekSavvy]
· SSD [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]