On Nov. 7, Maurice Robberson pled guilty to conspiracy and felony copyright infringement, while Thomas Robberson pled guilty to a single count of felony copyright infringement.

said by TKJunkMail :

Copyright infringement is ALSO a criminal offense when the gov't wants to bother to prosecute it.

said by 81399672 :

here is big differences that you seem not never understand. They were selling pirated stuff as such as that is illegal and as you correctly posted will put you in jail. Downloading pirate software is not against any criminal law and such will not put you in jail. Technically it's not even illegal to download pirated stuff and not illegal to upload it as that is the only people riaa ever goes after. Sorry tk junk mail i know you really try to scare people but it's not working

There are four essential elements required to prove felony copyright infringement: (1) that a registered copyright exists, (2) that the defendant infringed by reproduction or distribution of the copyrighted work, (3) that the defendant acted willfully and (4) that the works infringed were at least 10 copies of one or more copyrighted works with a total value of $2,500 within a 180-day period. Willfulness continues to be a very illusive concept, but the statute provides no definition.

Until recently, the prosecution was required to prove that copyright infringement was done willfully and for commercial advantage or private financial gain. Now the law provides for prosecution in the absence of these monetary considerations. Specifically, the current statute, as codified at 17 U.S.C. § 506(a)(2), allows for prosecution in cases involving large scale illegal reproduction or distribution of copyrighted works where the infringers act willfully, but without a discernible profit motive.

Cases alleging illegal distribution of copyrighted materials without commercial gain have been charged all over the country. In August 1999, the first person was convicted for illegally posting computer software programs, musical recordings, and digitally-recorded movies on his Web site, and allowing the general public to download and copy these products free of charge. The Oregon defendant pleaded guilty to a felony.

Prosecutors should not hesitate to utilize this avenue of enforcement. In many cases the damage to the victim may be enormous although the infringer is not profiting financially. In fact, because the copyrighted materials are provided without charge to the entire Internet-using public, the demand for the infringing goods provided for free may increase dramatically and result in great potential loss to the rights holder.

said by james :

Free distribution isn't piracy, piracy is when people sell copies for money and take actual sales away from the owner.

said by axus :

The difference is you are certain that someone had the money if they paid for it... when I was in high school/college I knew plenty of downloaders, now that everyone I know has money, nobody pirates

said by floydb_1982 :

If all your doing is checking out audio CD's for your local library and copy them to your computer without sharing the music files over the internet are you aloud to do that or is it a copyright infringement?

said by floydb_1982 :

If all your doing is checking out audio CD's for your local library and copy them to your computer without sharing the music files over the internet are you aloud to do that or is it a copyright infringement?

said by KrK :

The laws have gotten very fascist lately. If they find a small amount of copied files, songs, or movies, they have multiple ways to come at you and try and bury you and claim you're a dangerous felon.

The punishments massively outweigh the "crime" but even so, that's the way it is. They really don't give a damn about "silly" clauses in some old piece of paper....

said by 81399672 :

I have yet to see a single case in which a person is being sued for downloading files. I only seen people getting caught for uploading the files and letting other people download from them