Re: Ads? - dslreports.com

Author	All Replies
dvd536 as Mr. Pink as they come Premium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ	reply to Anonymous Re: Ads? said by Anonymous : Well while that's a major improvement over TV advertising it's still something I am not interested in. 90 sec of ads is 90 sec too much. I'd rather stick with low quality youtube videos than watch ads. The only reason theres so few ads on the online versions is that bandwidth to serve them costs money. -- You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-03-09 17:09:01 ·
Anonymous Premium join:2004-06-01 IA	said by dvd536 : said by Anonymous : Well while that's a major improvement over TV advertising it's still something I am not interested in. 90 sec of ads is 90 sec too much. I'd rather stick with low quality youtube videos than watch ads. The only reason theres so few ads on the online versions is that bandwidth to serve them costs money. I like when they do text advertising on the page, I can easily block that. Video ads suck. I don't care about their expenses. I want it free and I want it now Using Firefox, Adblock, Admuncher, HOSTS to block that crap. Also pay for DVR service through my cable co just to skip ads. Yeah I hate ads.
Anonymous Premium join:2004-06-01 IA	to forum · permalink · · 2008-03-09 17:18:57 ·


Friday, 05-Sep 20:25:07	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com. page compression OFF