<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20139460</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:38:50 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:38:50 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20147098</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/927346"><b>Tzale</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  woody7 <A HREF="/useremail/u/218971"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>so spying/intercepting your email/phone calls by any telecom, that was probably strong armed at a minimum without legal due process is not stepping on your (all of us) right(s)? What exactly do you consider stepping on, I am curious? The people have allowed them, in their belief that they are being protected. Except for a few news broadcasts, where is the uproar? The real problem is that the so called democracies around the world are chipping slowly away at the rights of it's citizens, and for the most part they are like sheep. Blocking a website, just because a judge says so is censorship, plain and simple, Peace <br> </div>Well my actions haven't been limited yet... I don't know what is going on behind the scenes, but so far I have been able to say what I want and not have men in black suits take me away.   :D<br><br>If the government here starts censoring websites, that would be an infringement on my rights.<br><br>-Tzale<br><small>--<br>Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not real conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html" >www.usconstitution.net/const.html</A> <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20147098</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:00:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20145445</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/625141"><b>pnh102</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  major marco <A HREF="/useremail/u/770196"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Well if Wiki says so, then it <b>must</b> be <A HREF="http://www.itworld.com/Tech/2987/nlsblog070306/">true and accurate!</a>  <br><br>You just keep on thinking that one, buddy.</div>So if i posted links from Google then, you would also claim them to be inaccurate?<br><br>The fact is "free speech zones" have existed long before Bush took office.  Furthermore, local police departments routinely keep opposing protesters physically blocked from interacting with one another.  It is nothing more than a matter of maintaining public order while allowing for people to engage in their rights to peacefully criticize the government.<br><br>Just because most of the population of this country acts as if it was born on 01/20/2001 doesn't change this simple fact.<br><small>--<br>This isn't fair!  I was only supposed to hate just ONE presidential candidate!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20145445</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:11:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20145410</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/770196"><b>major marco</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  pnh102 <A HREF="/useremail/u/625141"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>You need to dig deeper.  "Free speech zones" have existed for far longer than 8 years.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone#History" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speec&middot;&middot;&middot;#History</A><br> </div>Well if Wiki says so, then it <b>must</b> be <A HREF="http://www.itworld.com/Tech/2987/nlsblog070306/">true and accurate!</a>  <br><br>You just keep on thinking that one, buddy.  <br><small>--<br><b><A HREF="http://icasualties.org/oif/BY_DOD.aspx">The Toll</a></b><br><br>Let's Go Flyers!<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20145410</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:04:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20145100</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/218971"><b>woody7</b></A> : so spying/intercepting your email/phone calls by any telecom, that was probably strong armed at a minimum without legal due process is not stepping on your (all of us) right(s)? What exactly do you consider stepping on, I am curious? The people have allowed them, in their belief that they are being protected. Except for a few news broadcasts, where is the uproar? The real problem is that the so called democracies around the world are chipping slowly away at the rights of it's citizens, and for the most part they are like sheep. Blocking a website, just because a judge says so is censorship, plain and simple, Peace <br><small>--<br>BlooMe</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20145100</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:42:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20144183</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : In his farewell address, George Washington warned against entangling alliances with the outside world. His words were headed by a century of American presidents. Today, however, the United States is thoroughly entangled in a web of commitments throughout the world, and especially the Middle East.<br>The US is slated to spend 12 billion this month on the Iraq war. In a way, we've brought this on ourselves by violating what in Star Trek they call the "Prime Directive", which, BTW, is not bad advice, by meddling in the affairs of foreign nations and by giving the WMDs and the knowledge to build more WMDs.<br><br>As for rights to free speech, you have  only as much right as you have funds for a good legal defense. Justice is for the rich and the favored minorities.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20144183</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:24:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20144077</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/927346"><b>Tzale</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  woody7 <A HREF="/useremail/u/218971"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>what it had to do with is that "bush" wants to have the perception that that there are/is no one against him. If you are going to protest you have to do it someplace else or you are relegated to a spot where no one can see...The article was not about the "patriot act" or whatever name it goes by. It was about our most basic freedom, that we have the right to protest and how it is slowly be subverted.What is really troubling is this president espoused to be strong "constitutionalist" and has done more irreparable harm to it than any other president in history.What is happening here is as bad as in Israel. Knee jerk reaction on steroids. blatant censorship. I don't condone piracy, but...<br> </div>The Constitution is the most sacred document in this land... I agree 100% that we need to defend it... But all I'm saying is that the government THINKS they can step on our rights, but the people will NOT allow them to do so... I REFUSE to let them step on my rights. So far they have not. If they ever do, I will be sure to fight them.<br><br>-Tzale<br><small>--<br>Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not real conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html" >www.usconstitution.net/const.html</A> <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20144077</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:52:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20142248</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/197199"><b>Doctor Four</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JSRoman <A HREF="/useremail/u/1171845"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Done_Posting <A HREF="/useremail/u/862905"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>We have to learn to respect the sovereign rights of other nations. Failure to do so has cost countless sums of money and thousands of soldiers' lives in Iraq, and is also why most other countries currently despise us (the USA). <br><br>- Tate<br><br> </div>Bravo! Bravo! Linking Israel blocking some sites to Iraq War! Amazing, in a freakish kind of way. Someone has to come up with a version of Godwin's Law for the Iraq War. ;)<br> </div>In Usenet terminology, that would be an example of an<br>Iraq Meta-Godwin. <br><small>--<br>"The trouble with computers, of course, is that they are very sophisticated idiots." - Doctor Who (from Robot)<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20142248</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:28:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20140720</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/218971"><b>woody7</b></A> : what it had to do with is that "bush" wants to have the perception that that there are/is no one against him. If you are going to protest you have to do it someplace else or you are relegated to a spot where no one can see...The article was not about the "patriot act" or whatever name it goes by. It was about our most basic freedom, that we have the right to protest and how it is slowly be subverted.What is really troubling is this president espoused to be strong "constitutionalist" and has done more irreparable harm to it than any other president in history.What is happening here is as bad as in Israel. Knee jerk reaction on steroids. blatant censorship. I don't condone piracy, but...<br><small>--<br>BlooMe</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20140720</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:59:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20140558</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/867668"><b>macaholic</b></A> : Speech may be "free" but it's no longer private..<br><br>the government seems to feel that all speech needs to recorded, itemized and stored.  What do you think is next???<br><br>Heil Bush, Heil Bush<br><small>--<br> "You don't subject minority rights to a referendum."  Justice Minister Irwin Cotler of Canada</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20140558</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:33:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20140233</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1171845"><b>JSRoman</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Done_Posting <A HREF="/useremail/u/862905"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>We have to learn to respect the sovereign rights of other nations. Failure to do so has cost countless sums of money and thousands of soldiers' lives in Iraq, and is also why most other countries currently despise us (the USA). <br><br>- Tate<br><br> </div>Bravo! Bravo! Linking Israel blocking some sites to Iraq War! Amazing, in a freakish kind of way. Someone has to come up with a version of Godwin's Law for the Iraq War. ;)<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.seabee.navy.mil" >www.seabee.navy.mil</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20140233</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:30:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139986</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1479210"><b>SilverSurfer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Tzale <A HREF="/useremail/u/927346"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>They can try to take our rights away, but if you get a good lawyer, you can tell them to go screw themselves. <br><br>-Tzale<br> </div>Because that worked so well for Sibel Edmonds, didn't it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139986</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:42:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139617</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/927346"><b>Tzale</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  major marco <A HREF="/useremail/u/770196"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Tzale <A HREF="/useremail/u/927346"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>This is why I'm glad I live in the U.S.... No matter what anyone says, the Government can't infringe on our right to free speech. They can try, but they're going to lose. Other nations don't usually have these provisions in their Constitutions.<br><br>-Tzale<br> </div><A HREF="http://baltimorechronicle.com/052704FreeSpeechZones.shtml">Where have you been the past 8 years?</a><br> </div>I'm not even going to bother reading your link... But I bet it has something to do with Bush and the Patriot Act...<br><br>They can try to take our rights away, but if you get a good lawyer, you can tell them to go screw themselves. <br><br>-Tzale<br><small>--<br>Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not real conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html" >www.usconstitution.net/const.html</A> <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139617</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:27:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139542</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/625141"><b>pnh102</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  major marco <A HREF="/useremail/u/770196"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><A HREF="http://baltimorechronicle.com/052704FreeSpeechZones.shtml">Where have you been the past 8 years?</a><br> </div>You need to dig deeper.  "Free speech zones" have existed for far longer than 8 years.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone#History" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speec&middot;&middot;&middot;#History</A><br><small>--<br>This isn't fair!  I was only supposed to hate just ONE presidential candidate!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139542</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:12:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139534</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1157186"><b>quatrix</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Since you are in here posting anti-admin comments all the time, how has your free speech rights been limited? <br><br>If they were limited, as you claim, you would be in prison instead of spouting as usual.</div>The same place he should end up when he gets busted for the activities he tries to hide behind "free speech".  I'm not perfect, but when I do something wrong, I take responsibility for it.  I don't get defensive and blame the government, RIAA, etc. for being "evil" as if it somehow excuses my actions.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139534</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:12:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139508</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/862905"><b>Done_Posting</b></A> : Fair enough. <br><br>I agree with your statement that there's nothing wrong with speaking out against censorship, I just want it to be known that I do not support taking action (military or otherwise) against another country simply because they do not hold the same beliefs about freedom that we do. I realize I'm veering off topic, so I'll leave it at that. <br><br><div class="bquote">This is why I'm glad I live in the U.S.... No matter what anyone says, the Government can't infringe on our right to free speech. They can try, but they're going to lose.</div>I'm not so sure I agree with this. It's true that we have constitutional rights to speak out against whatever we want, but these days the constitution "is just a god damned piece of paper" the government is using to wipe its ass with. That's why I'm so disgusted with anyone who has not (or will not) vote for Ron Paul. Morons. <br><br>Sorry for the rant, fellow DSLR members. I'll step off my soapbox now!<br><br>- Tate<br><br><small>--<br>Happiness is an OC-768 in your basement...</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139508</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:07:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139495</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/770196"><b>major marco</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Tzale <A HREF="/useremail/u/927346"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>This is why I'm glad I live in the U.S.... No matter what anyone says, the Government can't infringe on our right to free speech. They can try, but they're going to lose. Other nations don't usually have these provisions in their Constitutions.<br><br>-Tzale<br> </div><A HREF="http://baltimorechronicle.com/052704FreeSpeechZones.shtml">Where have you been the past 8 years?</a><br><small>--<br><b><A HREF="http://icasualties.org/oif/BY_DOD.aspx">The Toll</a></b><br><br>Let's Go Flyers!<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139495</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:04:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139460</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/927346"><b>Tzale</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Done_Posting <A HREF="/useremail/u/862905"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>In this particular situation, I'd have to say that it's up to Israel what to choose what to allow entrance into their country's networks. For example, if they have the right to ban pineapples from entering their physical borders, what's so different about banning certain Internet traffic?<br><br>Mind you, I also see the need for network neutrality (within reason), but in this particular situation I feel it's fair for Israel to close their "int3rn3tz t00bz" to whatever they wish. I'd prefer that they limit this kind of censorship to stuff that's actually <i>illegal</i> under their laws, but...<br><br>We have to learn to respect the sovereign rights of other nations. Failure to do so has cost countless sums of money and thousands of soldiers' lives in Iraq, and is also why most other countries currently despise us (the USA). <br><br>- Tate<br><br> </div>Respecting sovereignty is one thing... No one is saying that we should go to war with Israel over this... But thinking that this is a BAD policy is fine and not an infringement on sovereignty. <br><br>Lets also not forget that Iraq was INVADED not because it wasn't "sovereign" but because Bush claimed there was WMDs. While I agree with you, I think you're mixing up two different things. Saudi Arabia stones people to death for the stupidest things... Do we invade them? No... But we can speak out against it.<br><br>This is why I'm glad I live in the U.S.... No matter what anyone says, the Government can't infringe on our right to free speech. They can try, but they're going to lose. Other nations don't usually have these provisions in their Constitutions.<br><br>-Tzale<br><small>--<br>Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not real conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html" >www.usconstitution.net/const.html</A> <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139460</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:55:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Can&#x27;t argue with Israel</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139435</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/862905"><b>Done_Posting</b></A> : In this particular situation, I'd have to say that it's up to Israel what to choose what to allow entrance into their country's networks. For example, if they have the right to ban pineapples from entering their physical borders, what's so different about banning certain Internet traffic?<br><br>Mind you, I also see the need for network neutrality (within reason), but in this particular situation I feel it's fair for Israel to close their "int3rn3tz t00bz" to whatever they wish. I'd prefer that they limit this kind of censorship to stuff that's actually <i>illegal</i> under their laws, but...<br><br>We have to learn to respect the sovereign rights of other nations. Failure to do so has cost countless sums of money and thousands of soldiers' lives in Iraq, and is also why most other countries currently despise us (the USA). <br><br>- Tate<br><br><small>--<br>Happiness is an OC-768 in your basement...</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20139435</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:48:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
