  major marco Res Firma Mitescere Nescit Premium join:2003-02-13 Stepford, CA clubs:
| reply to Tzale Re: Can't argue with Israel
said by Tzale :This is why I'm glad I live in the U.S.... No matter what anyone says, the Government can't infringe on our right to free speech. They can try, but they're going to lose. Other nations don't usually have these provisions in their Constitutions. -Tzale Where have you been the past 8 years? -- The Toll
Let's Go Flyers!
|
|
 quatrix Premium join:2005-02-11 Davie, FL
| Re: Can't argue with Israel
said by TKJunkMail :Since you are in here posting anti-admin comments all the time, how has your free speech rights been limited? If they were limited, as you claim, you would be in prison instead of spouting as usual. The same place he should end up when he gets busted for the activities he tries to hide behind "free speech". I'm not perfect, but when I do something wrong, I take responsibility for it. I don't get defensive and blame the government, RIAA, etc. for being "evil" as if it somehow excuses my actions. |
|
  pnh102 Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty Premium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast
| reply to major marco You need to dig deeper. "Free speech zones" have existed for far longer than 8 years.
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speec···#History -- This isn't fair! I was only supposed to hate just ONE presidential candidate! |
|
  Tzale Proud Libertarian Conservative Premium join:2004-01-06 Sweden
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online
| reply to major marco said by major marco :said by Tzale :This is why I'm glad I live in the U.S.... No matter what anyone says, the Government can't infringe on our right to free speech. They can try, but they're going to lose. Other nations don't usually have these provisions in their Constitutions. -Tzale Where have you been the past 8 years? I'm not even going to bother reading your link... But I bet it has something to do with Bush and the Patriot Act...
They can try to take our rights away, but if you get a good lawyer, you can tell them to go screw themselves.
-Tzale -- Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not real conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 »www.usconstitution.net/const.html
|
|
 SilverSurfer
join:2007-08-19
| said by Tzale :They can try to take our rights away, but if you get a good lawyer, you can tell them to go screw themselves. -Tzale Because that worked so well for Sibel Edmonds, didn't it. |
|
 macaholic Premium join:2003-08-31 Jackson Heights, NY
| reply to Anon Speech may be "free" but it's no longer private..
the government seems to feel that all speech needs to recorded, itemized and stored. What do you think is next???
Heil Bush, Heil Bush -- "You don't subject minority rights to a referendum." Justice Minister Irwin Cotler of Canada |
|
  woody7 Premium join:2000-10-13 Torrance, CA
·EarthLink
·DSL EXTREME
| reply to Tzale what it had to do with is that "bush" wants to have the perception that that there are/is no one against him. If you are going to protest you have to do it someplace else or you are relegated to a spot where no one can see...The article was not about the "patriot act" or whatever name it goes by. It was about our most basic freedom, that we have the right to protest and how it is slowly be subverted.What is really troubling is this president espoused to be strong "constitutionalist" and has done more irreparable harm to it than any other president in history.What is happening here is as bad as in Israel. Knee jerk reaction on steroids. blatant censorship. I don't condone piracy, but... -- BlooMe |
|
  Tzale Proud Libertarian Conservative Premium join:2004-01-06 Sweden
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online
| said by woody7 :what it had to do with is that "bush" wants to have the perception that that there are/is no one against him. If you are going to protest you have to do it someplace else or you are relegated to a spot where no one can see...The article was not about the "patriot act" or whatever name it goes by. It was about our most basic freedom, that we have the right to protest and how it is slowly be subverted.What is really troubling is this president espoused to be strong "constitutionalist" and has done more irreparable harm to it than any other president in history.What is happening here is as bad as in Israel. Knee jerk reaction on steroids. blatant censorship. I don't condone piracy, but... The Constitution is the most sacred document in this land... I agree 100% that we need to defend it... But all I'm saying is that the government THINKS they can step on our rights, but the people will NOT allow them to do so... I REFUSE to let them step on my rights. So far they have not. If they ever do, I will be sure to fight them.
-Tzale -- Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not real conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 »www.usconstitution.net/const.html
|
|
  woody7 Premium join:2000-10-13 Torrance, CA
·EarthLink
·DSL EXTREME
| reply to Tzale Re: Can't argue with Israel
so spying/intercepting your email/phone calls by any telecom, that was probably strong armed at a minimum without legal due process is not stepping on your (all of us) right(s)? What exactly do you consider stepping on, I am curious? The people have allowed them, in their belief that they are being protected. Except for a few news broadcasts, where is the uproar? The real problem is that the so called democracies around the world are chipping slowly away at the rights of it's citizens, and for the most part they are like sheep. Blocking a website, just because a judge says so is censorship, plain and simple, Peace -- BlooMe |
|
  major marco Res Firma Mitescere Nescit Premium join:2003-02-13 Stepford, CA clubs:
| reply to pnh102 Well if Wiki says so, then it must be true and accurate!
You just keep on thinking that one, buddy. -- The Toll
Let's Go Flyers!
|
|
  pnh102 Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty Premium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast
1 edit | said by major marco :Well if Wiki says so, then it must be true and accurate!You just keep on thinking that one, buddy. So if i posted links from Google then, you would also claim them to be inaccurate?
The fact is "free speech zones" have existed long before Bush took office. Furthermore, local police departments routinely keep opposing protesters physically blocked from interacting with one another. It is nothing more than a matter of maintaining public order while allowing for people to engage in their rights to peacefully criticize the government.
Just because most of the population of this country acts as if it was born on 01/20/2001 doesn't change this simple fact. -- This isn't fair! I was only supposed to hate just ONE presidential candidate! |
|
  Tzale Proud Libertarian Conservative Premium join:2004-01-06 Sweden
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online
| reply to woody7 said by woody7 :so spying/intercepting your email/phone calls by any telecom, that was probably strong armed at a minimum without legal due process is not stepping on your (all of us) right(s)? What exactly do you consider stepping on, I am curious? The people have allowed them, in their belief that they are being protected. Except for a few news broadcasts, where is the uproar? The real problem is that the so called democracies around the world are chipping slowly away at the rights of it's citizens, and for the most part they are like sheep. Blocking a website, just because a judge says so is censorship, plain and simple, Peace Well my actions haven't been limited yet... I don't know what is going on behind the scenes, but so far I have been able to say what I want and not have men in black suits take me away. 
If the government here starts censoring websites, that would be an infringement on my rights.
-Tzale -- Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not real conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 »www.usconstitution.net/const.html
|
|