Thug21
join:2005-08-21
edit:
March 10th, @08:12PM
| reply to spoofer
Re: February AV Comparatives are out.
Truth be told, it normally does beat KAV by a little bit. Both products are known for very good detection, though. |
|
spoofer
@optonline.net
| It didn't two years ago at this time, and it might not always.
Just a summary of the results as I see it, considering all of the other players are either A) inferior or B) the same engine, or C) F-Secure (poor client).
Of course if you have 98% and a stable/fast real-time scanner you're still perhaps doing better than KAV. |
|
Thug21
join:2005-08-21
edit:
March 10th, @08:12PM
| I don't think Avira was the same program at all 2-3 years ago so you are probably right. It has been winning for a while though. Glad to see you are interested in it's rise to the top.  |
|
Mele20
Premium
join:2001-06-05
Hilo, HI | And the test was done with a soon to be obsolete engine. I wish AV-Comparatives had been able to use the new Avira 8 engine. |
|
KoRnGtL15
Premium
join:2007-01-04
Grants Pass, OR | I just got Avira Premium not to long ago. Its actually a free 6 month trial. However. When its up. I will be buying it. Will the new engine be a free upgrade? |
|
Thug21
join:2005-08-21
edit:
March 10th, @09:42PM
| said by KoRnGtL15  :I just got Avira Premium not to long ago. Its actually a free 6 month trial. However. When its up. I will be buying it. Will the new engine be a free upgrade? I'm quite sure it would be. Avira licenses are measured in years, not versions. |
|
