republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Martin Side Stepped Forced FCC Exit » Dems better for Cable, maybe?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
49
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Politics in NC »
« No suprise  
AuthorAll Replies

MyDogHsFleas
Premium
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T Southwest

Dems better for Cable, maybe?

The Democrats are mostly anti-Telco because they see them as cooperating with the Republican war effort. Democrats are currently trying to punish Telcos by stripping the immunity clause out of the security law renewal. So I would think that a Democratic administration would be welcomed by Cable because "the enemy of my enemy is my friend".

Also, network neutrality is a much smaller bullet for them to bite then full blown regulatory hell (a la carte channels, price regulation, antitrust, etc. etc.). Maybe the Dems would spare them the latter if they roll over on the former.


Sam Spade

@verizon.net

Ah, no. The Telecom Act of 1996 was passed by the Democrats, Clinton and Gore and implemented by Democratic Chairs Reed Hundt and William Kennard. The dems were procompetition, supporting just about any way for competition to form. The Telecom Act provided for UNEs and CLECS, and long distance competition, and mobile phone competition. At the end of the term, there were independent 7000 ISPs, 1000s of CLECs, long distance competition, and more.

And then Republican Powell came in. And while Powell had a policy, Martian followed and the only policy he had was "how much did you give to the bush / cheney campaign." And they got rid of UNEs. And they got rid of ISPs. And they got rid of CLECs. And they permitted merger after merger. And what is now the biggest company? ATT (aka SBC from Pres Bush's hometown of Austin).

The dems were pro telecom in that they were pro competition and under their administration telecom grew like wild fire. The Bush /Cheney loyalists are pro campaign contributors and have no real telecom policy other then, "who is on our side."


BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

said by Sam Spade :

Ah, no. The Telecom Act of 1996 was passed by the Democrats,
Nice story but republicans took control of both the house and senate in jan of 1995. If you can't have SIMPLE facts straight why believe ANYTHING you have to say?

ender7074

join:2006-11-21
Saint Louis, MO
/sigh. Guess the fact that Clinton SIGNED the damn bill still frees him from any responsiblitiy. Check YOUR facts pal.
Forums » Martin Side Stepped Forced FCC ExitPolitics in NC »
« No suprise  


Tuesday, 24-Nov 03:07:22 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [84] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [54] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [29] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [26] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [12] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [12] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
· [7] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [ Classes] Druid tanking: rotation and glyphs [World of Warcraft]
· [Config] cisco asa 5505 with multiple outside IP addresses [Cisco]
· [NV] Speed Upgrade [Cox HSI]