Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Trying To Digest ISP TOS Changes An Impossible Task » The new TOS
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
TOS not properly communicated = no TOS. »
« Thank goodness...  
AuthorAll Replies

lvlorpheus

join:2008-02-17
Eureka Springs, AR

reply to EPS
Re: The new TOS

My question is if they do not enforce this part of the TOS, does it make that part of the TOS weightless? And if that is the case does it not make the whole TOS weightless, or can they just write up as many pages as they want and then just pick and choose whats real and whats not. Would it not be a lot easier to have a TOS that says "We reserve the right to do what ever we want." Or can we expect to hear about half to three quarters of Verizons customers receiving warnings regarding off topic violations.


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

said by lvlorpheus See Profile :

My question is if they do not enforce this part of the TOS, does it make that part of the TOS weightless? And if that is the case does it not make the whole TOS weightless, or can they just write up as many pages as they want and then just pick and choose whats real and whats not. Would it not be a lot easier to have a TOS that says "We reserve the right to do what ever we want." Or can we expect to hear about half to three quarters of Verizons customers receiving warnings regarding off topic violations.
I think they put everything they can think of in there so that they can drop anyone they want and then withstand a lawsuit over it.

An example. Say they have a customer that goes to msg board after msg board spamming something they sell over the internet. Complaints start rolling in to Verizon about that person. Now they can just dump them and say they posted "off topic". Hey it was in their TOS, so sue them and they win.

Of course, they could use some generic "we can dump anyone we want" line. But that would be harder to defend in court.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page


funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype

reply to lvlorpheus
said by lvlorpheus See Profile :

My question is if they do not enforce this part of the TOS, does it make that part of the TOS weightless?
Enforcement can simply mean investigating a complaint and ruling it unfounded. You (the customer) may never find out about it. If the ISP acts, it may be a mere warning which would become confidential to all except the ISP and that customer. So just because you don't hear a lot about enforcement, doesn't mean that it doesn't happen.

With that in mind, yes. Selectively enforcing certain provisions and not others can weaken the ISP's hand. Doing so set customers' expectations as to what the future will hold. Similarly, consistently enforcing provisions in the same manner likewise sets a pattern. Patterns of the past are predictors of the future. As it is not a criminal case, a judge or arbitrator will weigh the culmination of all the facts. In the end, the case should end with the judges determination of what probably happened versus how these policies would be interpreted by a reasonable person -- all things considered.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
"We don't throttle any traffic," -Charlie Douglas, Comcast spokesman, on this report.
Forums » Trying To Digest ISP TOS Changes An Impossible TaskTOS not properly communicated = no TOS. »
« Thank goodness...  


Thursday, 03-Dec 14:29:21 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [129] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [103] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [74] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [47] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [43] Cable Industry's 'Adoption Plus': Altruism Or PR Stunt?
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Warrior tank seem underpowered these days [World of Warcraft]
· Linux is terrorist - according to MS... [All Things Unix]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· [TWC] Audio/Video outage in Brooklyn [Time Warner Cable TV/Voice]
· Many Sites Unreachable [Rogers]
· In my inbox: ViaTalk Update - Introducing ViaTalk Mobile! [ViaTalk]
· Usenet Services- Clarification [TekSavvy]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]