<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Phorm is pretty much the same as NebuAD&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Phorm-is-pretty-much-the-same-as-NebuAD-20150766</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:20:51 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:20:51 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Phorm is pretty much the same as NebuAD</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Phorm-is-pretty-much-the-same-as-NebuAD-20150766</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I'm from the UK and confirm that Phorm is pretty much the same as NebuAD in terms of service provided, but what about the implementation?<br><br>Techies this is a MUST READ if you're at all concerned about what could be going on behind the scenes with your packets:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?548" >www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/&middot;&middot;&middot;.php?548</A><br><br>Can't speak for NebuAD's implementation, but I've spent 4 weeks studying Phorm.<br><br>O.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Phorm-is-pretty-much-the-same-as-NebuAD-20150766</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:25:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

