en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
| reply to brian188
Re: Definitely interesting...
I agree... this will be interesting, and as long as these ISP's don't become AOL all over again, they should not care what I use the bandwidth for, even if its competition. Its like me using dry loop DSL to run Vonage so that I don't have to pay BS fees to the Telco.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
brian188
Keep your Liberalism off my paycheck
Premium
join:2006-03-23
Loveland, CO | reply to en102
All true, but I take exception to the article calling it "competitor's bandwidth". It's MY bandwidth! I'll do what I want with it. I don't buy a Chevy, and then let Chevy tell me I can't drive to a Ford dealer.
Should be fun to watch. |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | reply to djrobx
Especially if its HD. Standard def wouldn't be an issue for many users - HD = high bandwidth
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
djrobx
join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
 ·PHONE POWER
 ·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable
1 edit | quote:
As we've stated repeatedly, this particular launch will be interesting because you've got a satellite provider suddenly using a competitor's bandwidth to deliver high-definition content -- something that speaks strongly to the debate over a neutral 'Net.
It will defnitely be interesting to see how the broadband industry responds. It's a double-edged sword. It definitely could tax their resources quite a bit, at the worst times. On the other hand, it could give some less technical "joe sixpacks" a real reason to step up to faster, more expensive broadband tiers.
--
Laser eye surgery rocks! I love frickin' laser beams. |
|
