republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


zno

join:2002-01-08
Atlanta, GA
Reviews:
·ooma

1 edit

reply to jc100

Re: Sigh

said by jc100:

Well I agree and disagree some on the Mythbuster test. While they are not scientists, they do a good job of replicating results. Sure, someone's test might have showed different results, leading to the current bans. I don't dispute that. However, their test should at least serve as some credence to review the issue again. That is my point anyway.

As per hopping from tower to tower, that's what the airline is doing with EVDO already. I have that on my cell phone and the ability to use it on my laptop. I'd be doing no different than the airline itself. Jumping from tower to tower to maintain internet via my cell phone.
unless you're jack bauer, i doubt your data card/cell phone will work in a flying aircraft. even if signals from the cell towers (which btw are installed horizontally) can reach your aircraft, signal from your handheld will probably not reach the ground.


Jerm

join:2000-04-10
Richland, WA
kudos:2

1 edit

Yeah...

Good in theory (use own EVDO on flights) - Bad in reality.

I accidentally left my cell on during a flight a while back. When I opened my bag and found it (@ 30,000ft) - sure enough it was complaining about "no signal".

C'mon you're in a metal tube going 600mph 6 miles above the earth and you think the "built in" antenna on the cell would actually do anything???


Wednesday, 30-May 02:04:07 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics