<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>So What? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20161138</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:59:50 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:59:50 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>So What?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20161138</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464969"><b>benc</b></A> : I live in an AT&T area, but only for phone.  I live too far from the C.O. to get DSL.  So now I have to use the cable company, who's prices aren't even competitive to AT&T Static IP DSL.<br><br>Plus AT&T doesn't seem serious about their FTTP, and even if they were they still don't offer speeds faster than 10Mbit, even though they could.  And they should, since there are people who'd pay for it.<br><br>I only hope this means more FTTP and faster speeds.<br><br>I can care less about their U-Verse TV.  But I think that 20/20 Fiber Internet would be really nice right now, especially if they can do it within $100/mo.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20161138</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:24:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
