<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Definitely interesting... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20161970</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:06:59 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:06:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Definitely interesting...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20161970</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : I agree... this will be interesting, and as long as these ISP's don't become AOL all over again, they should not care what I use the bandwidth for, even if its competition.  Its like me using dry loop DSL to run Vonage so that I don't have to pay BS fees to the Telco.<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20161970</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:13:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Definitely interesting...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20160848</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1343004"><b>brian188</b></A> : All true, but I take exception to the article calling it "competitor's bandwidth". It's MY bandwidth! I'll do what I want with it. I don't buy a Chevy, and then let Chevy tell me I can't drive to a Ford dealer. <br><br>Should be fun to watch.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20160848</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:34:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Definitely interesting...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20158864</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : Especially if its HD.  Standard def wouldn't be an issue for many users - HD = high bandwidth<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20158864</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:53:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Definitely interesting...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20158523</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/162762"><b>djrobx</b></A> :   <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>As we've stated repeatedly, this particular launch will be interesting because you've got a satellite provider suddenly using a competitor's bandwidth to deliver high-definition content -- something that speaks strongly to the debate over a neutral 'Net.<hr></blockquote><br>It will defnitely be interesting to see how the broadband industry responds.   It's a double-edged sword.  It definitely could tax their resources quite a bit, at the worst times.  On the other hand, it could give some less technical "joe sixpacks" a real reason to step up to faster, more expensive broadband tiers.  <br><small>--<br>Laser eye surgery rocks!  I love frickin' laser beams.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20158523</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:02:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
