<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T didnt Compete in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20163590</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:30:18 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:30:18 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T didnt Compete</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20167549</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : The difference is:  They are Telcos, and Charter is a Cable Co.<br><br>Which is to say, none really.  Except:  Martin's bias.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20167549</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:13:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T didnt Compete</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20163590</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I agree. I hate Comcast, but this is no different than AT&T]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20163590</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:17:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T didnt Compete</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20163489</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/939879"><b>openbox9</b></A> : Comcast doesn't compete with TWC, Cablevision, Charter, etc. Comcast merging with or acquiring additional pay TV providers is absolutely no different than AT&T purchasing Bellsouth.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20163489</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:50:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T didnt Compete</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20163488</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1048555"><b>BF69</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NewMariner <A HREF="/useremail/u/1223921"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>At&t didnt compete with Bellsouth.  Thats why the merger went through.  It didnt reduce the number of companies providing service.  Comcast wants to buy out the competition. Thus, reducing the number of providers...<br> </div>And Comcast doesn't compete with TW, Charter or Cox. Hardly anyone lives in an area where there are 2 cable companies. Comcast competes with DirectTV which is allowed to have more than 30% of the TV market. If DirectTv had 50 million subscribrs would the FCC be stepping in and preventing that? No. If at&t or verizon had 50 million Tv subscrinbers would the FCC be trying to stop that? No. So exactly what is the difference?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20163488</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:50:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T didnt Compete</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20163396</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/971611"><b>Paulg</b></A> : Comcast is doing exactly the same thing as AT&T, expanding their footprint.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20163396</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:26:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>AT&#x26;T didnt Compete</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20163379</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1223921"><b>NewMariner</b></A> : At&t didnt compete with Bellsouth.  Thats why the merger went through.  It didnt reduce the number of companies providing service.  Comcast wants to buy out the competition. Thus, reducing the number of providers...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20163379</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:23:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
