<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Silly rule in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20163656</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:41:54 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:41:54 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Silly rule</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20163754</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/954179"><b>sharksfan3</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  DMS1 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1184874"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>such as mandating at least two cable-type carriers in cities with over 250,000 people.<br> </div>I'm not sure how that will work over one pipe. Given the space crunch that cableco's are experiencing all by their loansome with HD channels.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20163754</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:40:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Silly rule</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20163656</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1184874"><b>DMS1</b></A> : The 30% rule doesn't help competition at all. If you are going to have legislation, do something that will ensure competition in key geographic areas, such as mandating at least two cable-type carriers in cities with over 250,000 people.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20163656</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:27:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
