<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Win for consumers that aren&#x27;t in New England in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20173603</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:41:53 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:41:53 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Win for consumers that aren&#x27;t in New England</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20173603</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/406960"><b>bear73</b></A> : yea, now more of your monthly check to them will be lining their pockets...<br><small>--<br>If ya gotta go, Go with a SMILE!<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/" >www.thereligionofpeace.com/</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20173603</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:39:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Win for consumers that aren&#x27;t in New England</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20165134</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/896245"><b>hoyleysox</b></A> : Let me spin this the other way. Its a win-win for over 90% of consumers, since most consumers do not live in New England...<br><br>Lines in rural New England lines are more expensive to service (on average) than lines in dense-urban population centers. <br><br>If you are a consumer that does not live in New England, this is a win-win for you because your bill will no longer be subsidizing those expensive New England lines (except for through USF).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20165134</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:18:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
