BF69
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN
| reply to Rexter
Re: Good luck
said by Rexter  :This is great! We're about to see a new age of encryption, and P2P strength. It's gonna be great, and best of all here in the US, we'll benefit from this new robustness without any interruption to my file sharing. Sweet!!!! So you admit to being a theif? nice. Great morals you have. Any reason why you can't pay for your content? Even at minimum wage it's possible to do so. |
|
Rexter
YeeHaw
join:2002-11-17
cloud 9
1 edit |  Thanks for the assumption. You can go now. |
|
BF69
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN
| said by Rexter :Thanks for the assumption. You can go now. well if you're not stealing then there is no need to brag that one can get around any filters. Since the filters are there to ctach the thieves, why should it worry you to get around them if you are not doing anything illegal? Hmmmmmm.
Sorry but if someone brags about being able to get around a drug test then I am going to assume they are doing drugs. |
|
Sean
join:2004-01-23
Ottawa
 ·Bell Sympatico
| reply to BF69
said by BF69 :said by Rexter :This is great! We're about to see a new age of encryption, and P2P strength. It's gonna be great, and best of all here in the US, we'll benefit from this new robustness without any interruption to my file sharing. Sweet!!!! So you admit to being a theif? nice. Great morals you have. Any reason why you can't pay for your content? Even at minimum wage it's possible to do so. I'd like to live where you are if your minimum wage allows you to put aside money for entertainment. |
|
Rexter
YeeHaw
join:2002-11-17
cloud 9
| reply to BF69
Well you know what they say about ASSumptions, which I think applies well here. You are mixing issues. Stealing, and illegal are not the same thing. Refusing to comply with a set of rules that are designed by, and tilted in someone else's self-perceived favor is not stealing. Here is why I say this. Lets take two situations. #1 I download a movie, and watch it. #2 I Tivo a movie from Network TV, and watch it. Neither scenario places in, or takes money out of the studios pocket. Frankly they hate the idea of either one of these two scenarios. If they had they're way, I have to pay for it if I even thought of watching the movie. But the fact is that one of these methods happens to fit under the current rule of Copyright law, and the other doesn't. Frankly I don't give a rats ass, and have no moral issue, because neither of these actions are stealing.
--
With every new wave of optimism, or pessimism, we are ready to abandon history, and time tested principles, but we cling tenaciously and unquestioningly to our prejudices. (Benjamin Graham) |
|
ztmike
Mark for moderation
Premium
join:2001-08-02
Michigan City, IN
 ·Comcast
| reply to Sean
said by Sean :said by BF69 :said by Rexter :This is great! We're about to see a new age of encryption, and P2P strength. It's gonna be great, and best of all here in the US, we'll benefit from this new robustness without any interruption to my file sharing. Sweet!!!! So you admit to being a theif? nice. Great morals you have. Any reason why you can't pay for your content? Even at minimum wage it's possible to do so. I'd like to live where you are if your minimum wage allows you to put aside money for entertainment. X2
Hell I'm having trouble making 10x as much as Indiana's minimum wage.
--
»chris.pirillo.com/live/ |
|
jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL | If you're having trouble getting by on $50-60 per hour, you either need to work more hours or seriously re-evaluate your lifestyle. |
|
