|
  sporkme drop the crantini and move it, sister Premium,MVM join:2000-07-01 Morristown, NJ | Re: Links to more details about the interference study Did the FCC not see this coming, or have they closed down all their engineering operations in favor of lawyering and disbursement of lobbying funds? | |
|
 |   TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
2 edits | Re: Links to more details about the interference study said by sporkme :Did the FCC not see this coming, or have they closed down all their engineering operations in favor of lawyering and disbursement of lobbying funds? In a small defense of the FCC, a working group of the ITU OK'd a compromise using Wimax and other terrestrial broadband frequencies after years of wrangling between the sat industry and ground based wireless firms. They split up frequencies to theoretically avoid interference. The latest studies seem to indicate that even though the C-Band and Wimax don't share the same frequencies, that interference is still taking place anyway from adjacent frequency bands. The ITU may need to revisit the brokered compromise if the latest study is accurate and no mitigations can avoid the interference.
»www.developingtelecoms.com/conte···1035/59/ -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|
 |  cmaenginsb Premium,MVM join:2001-03-19 Palmdale, CA | No, they did regulate the new 3.65 band to prevent it's use near large concentrations of C-band usage such as los angeles. | |
|
  ureihcim Freshly made
join:2007-12-16 Miami, FL
| After reading the report, it more than likely sounds as if they are also trying to include other forms of terrestrial based systems in the mix.
But also according to the report BWA is operating on the same frequency range as the CB for it's satellite downlinks.
On Wikipedia:
"The 5.4GHz band (5.15â5.35/5.47â5.725/5.725â5.875 GHz) is used for IEEE 802.11a WIFI and cordless phone applications, leading to occasional interference with C band weather radars."
So it's clearly a frequency issue in other countries, as C-band operates here in a lower frequency, and the current set frequencies for WiMAX are 2.5GHZ and not 3.4-5.4Ghz which is what C-band operates.
In short, the terrestrial signal from the WBA is overpowering the CB signal and is causing the receiver to go apeshit because they are both operating on the same frequency range. | |
|
 |   gaforces United We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07 Santa Cruz, CA
| Re: Links to more details about the interference study From what I can gather, without paying for a new scientist subscription, the frequency that WiMax will be operating in the US will not interfere with C band satellite.
The interference was obtained when the WiMax radios were tested on the higher frequencys that C-Band uses, which they can run on but wont. -- There is no greater sign of a general decay of virtue in a nation, than a want of zeal in its inhabitants for the good of their country. ~ Joseph Addison | |
|
 |  |   ureihcim Freshly made
join:2007-12-16 Miami, FL | Re: Links to more details about the interference study "The interference was obtained when the WiMax radios were tested on the higher frequencys that C-Band uses"
Exactly. | |
|
 Kearnstd Elf Wizard Premium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ
| well what we need to do is crank up a WiMAX network full wattage and see what happens.
what is C-Band still used for btw? i know that home owners no longer tune it as the big 1m dish is dead. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
 |   TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| Re: Links to more details about the interference study said by Kearnstd :well what we need to do is crank up a WiMAX network full wattage and see what happens. what is C-Band still used for btw? i know that home owners no longer tune it as the big 1m dish is dead. Businesses; military; cable companies. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|
 |
|
 |