 sporkmedrop the crantini and move it, sisterPremium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ | reply to ThrowDemsOut
Re: Links to more details about the interference study Did the FCC not see this coming, or have they closed down all their engineering operations in favor of lawyering and disbursement of lobbying funds? |
|
 ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium
join:2002-03-03
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:4
2 edits | said by sporkme:Did the FCC not see this coming, or have they closed down all their engineering operations in favor of lawyering and disbursement of lobbying funds? In a small defense of the FCC, a working group of the ITU OK'd a compromise using Wimax and other terrestrial broadband frequencies after years of wrangling between the sat industry and ground based wireless firms. They split up frequencies to theoretically avoid interference. The latest studies seem to indicate that even though the C-Band and Wimax don't share the same frequencies, that interference is still taking place anyway from adjacent frequency bands. The ITU may need to revisit the brokered compromise if the latest study is accurate and no mitigations can avoid the interference.
»www.developingtelecoms.com/conte···1035/59/
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
| reply to sporkme
No, they did regulate the new 3.65 band to prevent it's use near large concentrations of C-band usage such as los angeles. |
|
