Davebo_
join:2002-11-19
Canada | reply to Dunkan
Re: Secure browsers
Proof - right now.... |
|
Dunkan
join:2008-03-18
CA 08976
| said by Davebo_  :Proof - right now.... »www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2704,2138984,00.asp,
»paranoia.dubfire.net/2007/05/rem···fox.html
and many many hacker web sites will prove to u |
|
Cudni
La Merma - Los De Aca
Premium,MVM
join:2003-12-20
Someshire
 ·BTOpenworld
| If you look in your second link you will see
"...
Users of popular Firefox extensions such as NoScript, Greasemonkey, and AdBlock Plus have nothing to worry about.
..."
and from the 1st link
"...
The attack requires that other significant compromises exist on the network—specifically that the user's DNS server be compromised
.."
Cudni
--
"Mercifully, he hit him with the soft end of the pistol."
Help yourself so God can help you.
Microsoft MVP, 2006-2007 |
|
javaMan
Premium,MVM
join:2002-07-15
San Luis Obispo, CA
| said by Cudni :If you look in your second link you will see "... Users of popular Firefox extensions such as NoScript, Greasemonkey, and AdBlock Plus have nothing to worry about. ..." and from the 1st link "... The attack requires that other significant compromises exist on the network—specifically that the user's DNS server be compromised .." Cudni Please don't obscure the issue with facts.
--
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness. . . Isa. 5:20 |
|
Psicop
More human than human
Premium
join:2005-12-21
edit:
March 18th, @09:54AM
| reply to Dunkan
If you want to feel better: Ablock Plus and especially NoScript update almost daily in this box.
Edit: The extensions mentioned in the link you provided are basically virus magnets. I wouldn't touch any of those even with a 10 foot pole.
A different story is clicking on a "MySpace fake invite" as I did not many months ago. In that instance you are basically "pollo frito." |
|
Cudni
La Merma - Los De Aca
Premium,MVM
join:2003-12-20
Someshire
·BTOpenworld
| reply to javaMan
said by javaMan :Please don't obscure the issue with facts. I will not obscure the issue with facts.
I will not obscure the issue with facts.
I will not obscure the issue with facts.
I will not obscure the issue with facts.
I will not obscure the issue with facts.
I will not obscure the issue with facts.
I will not obscure the issue with facts.
I will not obscure the issue with facts.
I will not obscure the issue with facts.
Cudni
--
"Mercifully, he hit him with the soft end of the pistol."
Help yourself so God can help you.
Microsoft MVP, 2006-2007 |
|
Davebo_
join:2002-11-19
Canada
| reply to Dunkan
PCmag (lol) and a blog entry, eh?
NEXT!
In fairness, all browsers are insecure. Firefox, configured properly, is the most secure browser out there IMO. Opera is pretty decent as well, if you can get used to it. |
|
La Luna
Surviving Ashraful
Premium
join:2001-07-12
Warwick, NY
clubs:
 ·Optimum Online
 ·Vonage
| reply to Dunkan
First of all, both articles are almost a year old.
Secondly, don't believe ALL the FUD you read on the "internet".
Thirdly, use the correct extensions and DON'T use the incorrect ones (those not downloaded directly from Mozilla, as also mentioned) with Fx.
I don't know if that vulnerability even still exists, it may have been patched by now. Not to mention one of the following situations ALSO needs to be true for this vulnerability to work: "this possibility exists whenever the user cannot trust their domain name server (DNS) or network connection. Examples of this include public wireless networks, and users connected to compromised home routers".
There is NO browser that is 100% "secure", there is only MORE secure. And that would be Fx, especially with the right extensions.
--
10,741 DEADLY TERROR ATTACKS SINCE 9/11~~TEAM DISCOVERY
Can't feel you anymore, don't need you anymore, don't believe you anymore, I don't need you anymore
|
|
chrisretusn
Retired
Premium
join:2007-08-13
Philippines
| reply to javaMan
said by javaMan :Please don't obscure the issue with facts. Or old information.  |
|
