Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » U-Verse's Sorry Excuse For Public Access TV » Online
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Public Access  
AuthorAll Replies


jslik
That just happened
Premium
join:2006-03-17
clubs:

reply to Answer Guy
Re: Online

If going 100% streaming/internet isn't good enough for any other channel/network today, then why is it good enough for local access?

Books are cheap to buy (and even print these days) too, so why not get rid of the library? You'd save way more money...
--
If they told you wolverines would make good house pets, would you believe them?
-"Planes, Trains & Automobiles"

MyDogHsFleas
Premium
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T Southwest

To me this is one of those things that started rather accidentally and has now become an entitlement or right.

It just so happened that Cable TV grew up as a local community phenomenon, it was originally CATV or Community Antenna TV. Some community decided to toss this burden on them, and others picked it up and ran with it. Then the FCC mandated it.

Now it's become a cause. There are organizations defending "our right to public TV channel access!!"

I just wish it was possible to have a discussion where we list pros and cons rather than have these causes and fights.


jslik
That just happened
Premium
join:2006-03-17
clubs:

said by MyDogHsFleas See Profile :

Some community decided to toss this burden on them, and others picked it up and ran with it. Then the FCC mandated it.....I just wish it was possible to have a discussion where we list pros and cons rather than have these causes and fights.
Well, technically, it's not 'mandated' by the FCC, it was placed into law by Congress who said communities want it can get it, but if the community doesn't want it, the cable co. doesn't have to provide it. I'm being picky.

I think it's possible to have that pro/con fight, but there are few debates that don't devolve into a cause these days.

I did look up the last survey done in 1998 in Austin and it showed that 30% of then Time-Warner viewers watched public access frequently/occasionally. Many, many channels on cable would kill for numbers like that. Granted, the survey is ten years old, but I've seen similar numbers in more recent surveys in other places.
--
If they told you wolverines would make good house pets, would you believe them?
-"Planes, Trains & Automobiles"
Forums » U-Verse's Sorry Excuse For Public Access TV« Public Access  


Tuesday, 24-Nov 14:48:20 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [98] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [79] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [28] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [23] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [22] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [16] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [15] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
· [11] Time Warner Dallas Customers Get WiMax December 1
Most people now reading
· Mysterious $800 Cash Deposit? [General Questions]
· NDP - Jack Layton email on broadband [TekSavvy]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Is Gear Score now the new requirement to get pug invite? [World of Warcraft]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· Climate Change Scandal Erupts After Email Hack. [Security]
· Killing the source - Google bans advertisers, not just ads [Security]
· Firearms: Ammo question. [General Questions]