Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Exposing Verizon's FiOS Fine Print Trickery » Nothing new
 
Search Topic:
  Share Topic:
RSS topic:
 toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Verizion et al  
AuthorAll Replies


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA
·Comcast

reply to Skeedatl
Re: Nothing new

How about that study that showed that Comcast wins 97% of their arbitration cases? Remember, the arbitator is NOT neutral, they're hired by the company. If a high enough percentage of cases don't go their way, they can be replaced. That's not what arbitration is supposed to be.


Skeedatl
Ah, push it - push it real good
Premium
join:2007-12-26
The Cloud
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·ViaTalk
·Time Warner VOIP
·Cox VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

Just because Comcast won doesn't mean they weren't justified in winning 97% of the time and it depends on what is defined as winning. I would like to see that study if you have a link to it.

And arbitration is a far better solution than having a subscriber funded bottomless trough for the bloodsucking lawyers.

I'm no fan of corporations, I just hate the blood sucking vampire lawyers who are ruining this country.


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA
·Comcast

The study is here »www.citizen.org/documents/Final_wcover.pdf and it was 94%, not 97 - my mistake.

I have no problem with mandatory arbitration - if the company handling the arbitration doesn't have a relationship with either party.


Skeedatl
Ah, push it - push it real good
Premium
join:2007-12-26
The Cloud
I wonder who funds that think tank.


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA
Why don't you spend some time wondering who funds the arbitrators? And how can an arbitrator that's paid BY a company be neutral when handling that company's disputes?


Skeedatl
Ah, push it - push it real good
Premium
join:2007-12-26
The Cloud
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·ViaTalk
·Time Warner VOIP
·Cox VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable


edit:
March 19th, @02:18PM

said by vpoko See Profile :

Why don't you spend some time wondering who funds the arbitrators? And how can an arbitrator that's paid BY a company be neutral when handling that company's disputes?
Cause I know who funds them (arbitrators) and its' easy to be neutral.

In my business I pay my worker's comp auditor, ISO auditor, and a few others and they tell me to fix stuff and I don't fire them for it.

Meanwhile I always follow the money no matter who is telling their story.


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA
·Comcast

said by Skeedatl See Profile :

Meanwhile I always follow the money no matter who is telling their story.
No, you're obviously not following the money going to arbitrators. Why can an arbitrator remain neutral, even though it's in their interest to rule towards the company that hires them, but a think tank must have an agenda influenced by the source of their funding.

Sounds like you have a double standard when it comes to following the money.


Skeedatl
Ah, push it - push it real good
Premium
join:2007-12-26
The Cloud
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·ViaTalk
·Time Warner VOIP
·Cox VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

As I stated, just because the company pays them doesn't automatically mean they aren't neutral. In the course of my business pay auditors (the closest think to arbitrators I use) who are neutral. No problem.

No double standard. I always follow the money. Arbitration is far better that subscribers giving millions to greedy bloodsucking lawyers because the ISP blows up a notebook.


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA
·Comcast

said by Skeedatl See Profile :

As I stated, just because the company pays them doesn't automatically mean they aren't neutral. In the course of my business pay auditors (the closest think to arbitrators I use) who are neutral. No problem.
Sure it's a problem, remember Arthur Anderson? That's why we have the Sarbanes-Oxley Act now, to try to prevent auditors from getting in bed with the companies they're hired to audit. We need the same thing for arbitration.

Would you be opposed to the consumer choosing the arbitrator, with the loser paying the costs?


Skeedatl
Ah, push it - push it real good
Premium
join:2007-12-26
The Cloud
I would love nothing more than a loser pays system. It will fix everything from heathcare to patent trolling.
Forums » Exposing Verizon's FiOS Fine Print Trickery« Verizion et al  

Most commented news this week
· [176] East Coast Verizon Workers Authorize Strike
· [166] Is AT&T Hinting At Usage-Based Pricing This Fall?
· [149] Time Warner Cable Using Fine Print To Foist Caps On Customers
· [125] Is Broadband A Civil Right?
· [111] The Great Landline Exodus Continues
· [97] Update Your Browser, Dummy
· [83] Comcast Hit With Another Throttling Lawsuit
· [82] What's Your Favorite Newsgroup Provider?
· [80] Friday Open Thread
· [73] Google's Cerf: Baby Bells Act Like Tots Having Tantrums
Saturday, 26-Jul
02:07:22
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
8th year online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF