Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Exposing Verizon's FiOS Fine Print Trickery » Nothing new
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Verizion et al  
AuthorAll Replies


CConverse

join:2006-01-31
Syracuse, NY

reply to dispatcher21
Re: Nothing new

Who cares if there are arbitration clauses anyway? Most ISP TOS basically remove all responsibility from the companies as far as honest service provision and billing goes. Even if you tried to sue them, you'd lose because the companies' TOS states that if (insert complaint here) occurs, It's not their fault and the end user is responsible. If there even is an anti-arbitration clause, it's probably put in there to stop the whiners from wasting everyone's time and money.

Unreasonable

join:2007-10-15
Portland, OR
·Integra Telecom
·Comcast

Wow.

You really have NO knowledge of contracts.
I'm no lawyer, but we all have to deal with contracts.

The stuff in the TOS is the company's stated position.

It has zero force of law unless and until it's vetted through the courts. And it's a guaranteed fact that most clauses in these formula contracts would never ever be upheld by any court.

The arbitration clause is just a scare tactic to try to dissuade you from more formal legal remedies where the balance of power shifts to the weaker party.

Your best protection is to agree without ever reading the documents.

Since this is common practice, and the writers of these contracts know this, and take steps to promote keeping the other party in the dark, the odds of them ever being able to enforce any of it are remote.

Having the contract online further advances the consumer's position. Normally, both parties would have the opportunity to edit the contractual documents until a satisfactory 'meeting of the minds' is reached.

With an after the fact 'agreement' presented in a way to make negotiation impractical, I have no doubt that any court would toss it with a quickness.

If I were ever in a dispute, I would simply take the position that the agreement was entered into under duress, there was no meeting of the minds, and that it's null and void.

I would decline any arbitration attempt and proceed with civil action unless the other party were to make me whole.
Forums » Exposing Verizon's FiOS Fine Print Trickery« Verizion et al  


Saturday, 11-Oct 07:38:58 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [140] It's Cable TV Rate Hike Season
· [97] Wholesale Bandwidth Prices Still Dropping
· [95] Is Comcast Cooking Up a 22Mbps/5Mbps Tier?
· [95] Symmetrical FiOS No Longer Qualifies For Bundle Discounts
· [84] Time Warner's Ugly Feud With LIN TV
· [77] Half Of New iPhone Owners Came From Verizon
· [70] Supreme Court TiVo/Echostar Ruling
· [70] Microsoft: U.S. Broadband Policy 'Total Failure'
· [66] Verizon Unveils Blackberry Storm
· [64] XOHM Online In Additional Launch Markets
Most people now reading
· [Connectivity] Neighbor using MY router to connect to Internet? [Comcast HSI]
· Where did the money go? [General Questions]
· Extreme HD and Essentials [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Safty Question about K & T wiring. Very worried... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Homeowner Says Cable Mistake Filled Kitchen With Raw Sewage [Comcast Cable TV]
· [Rant] People who say Not voting for Barack because he's Black. [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· [Internet] Bell Business Internet Optimax Nightmare [Bell Canada]
· WOW CEO forces employees to listen to pro-Obama speach today [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· Fox News HD is on in MA [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Help 64-bit OS and software? [Software]