republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Exposing Verizon's FiOS Fine Print Trickery » Nothing new
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Verizion et al  
AuthorAll Replies


CConverse

join:2006-01-31
Syracuse, NY

reply to dispatcher21
Re: Nothing new

Who cares if there are arbitration clauses anyway? Most ISP TOS basically remove all responsibility from the companies as far as honest service provision and billing goes. Even if you tried to sue them, you'd lose because the companies' TOS states that if (insert complaint here) occurs, It's not their fault and the end user is responsible. If there even is an anti-arbitration clause, it's probably put in there to stop the whiners from wasting everyone's time and money.

Unreasonable

join:2007-10-15
Portland, OR
·Integra Telecom
·Comcast

Wow.

You really have NO knowledge of contracts.
I'm no lawyer, but we all have to deal with contracts.

The stuff in the TOS is the company's stated position.

It has zero force of law unless and until it's vetted through the courts. And it's a guaranteed fact that most clauses in these formula contracts would never ever be upheld by any court.

The arbitration clause is just a scare tactic to try to dissuade you from more formal legal remedies where the balance of power shifts to the weaker party.

Your best protection is to agree without ever reading the documents.

Since this is common practice, and the writers of these contracts know this, and take steps to promote keeping the other party in the dark, the odds of them ever being able to enforce any of it are remote.

Having the contract online further advances the consumer's position. Normally, both parties would have the opportunity to edit the contractual documents until a satisfactory 'meeting of the minds' is reached.

With an after the fact 'agreement' presented in a way to make negotiation impractical, I have no doubt that any court would toss it with a quickness.

If I were ever in a dispute, I would simply take the position that the agreement was entered into under duress, there was no meeting of the minds, and that it's null and void.

I would decline any arbitration attempt and proceed with civil action unless the other party were to make me whole.
Forums » Exposing Verizon's FiOS Fine Print Trickery« Verizion et al  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 16:48:50 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [108] Moto Sold About 100,000 Droids
· [93] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [86] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [60] Government Will Release Some Telco Wiretap Lobbying Documents
· [41] Verizon's Hanging Up On Rural America
· [34] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [20] Sprint Announces Job Cuts
· [18] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [17] Google Offers Free Holiday Airport Wi-Fi
Most people now reading
· House inspector failed to find major gas leak [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Google Has Acquired Gizmo5 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [northeast] Comparison of FiOS Broadband Internet to Comcast Bla [Verizon Fiber Optics]
· Water heater pilot light won't light [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· Apple hardware/software "strength and stability" [All Things Macintosh]
· MS forensics tool for law enforcement leaked online via P2P [Security]
· A fishy CRTC tarriff filed by bell? [TekSavvy]