Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T West » Email Problems?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
3.8Mbps acceptable for the Elite package? »
« Solved- Once again download speeds are slower than dial-up  
AuthorAll Replies


Erald

@telenet.be

reply to Lizz
Re: Email Problems?

I am sending email to a pacbell.net address, which normally always got there. Now at once I get it bounced as being rejected because the IP I am sending from is blocked.
host pbimail7.prodigy.net[207.115.37.22] said: 553
5.3.0 nlpi031,DNSBL:521

The servers I tried to sent from are no where listed as spamming servers nor has there been any problems there. (tried three different servers).

Mail is simply not getting through only via yahoo or hotmail. Complaining or questions are simply not answered.
So think you guys on att email will not get many email anymore since the blocking seems to be random.

This is happening randomly for some weeks now, sometimes it is getting through, sometimes it is not (now most of the times not)


gmccomb

@pacbell.net

Saw this problem one month ago (16 Feb 08). My sending IP's were and are not on any RBL's. Followed AT&T's "please remove block" procedure for admins and things got better until 17 Mar 2008. Since then, pbimailX.prodigy.net and sbcmxX.prodigy.net servers have been refusing (most/all?) email for users@pacbell.net and users@sbcglobal.net. AT&T responds to "please remove block" admin requests with auto email denying my IP's are blocked. So far, no response from follow-up emails except their auto email promising action within 24-48 hours (i.e. by yesterday), and sending me back to original "block_inquiry" Web page where I started.
... while talking to sbcmx7.prodigy.net.:
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 553 5.3.0 nlpi027,DNSBL:521 Vzzz.zzz.zzz.zzzV is blocked. For information see:»www.att.net/bls_rbl/
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T West3.8Mbps acceptable for the Elite package? »
« Solved- Once again download speeds are slower than dial-up  


Saturday, 05-Dec 01:07:10 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [80] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· ZR1 VS The USN Blue Angels! [56k Lookout (Broadband Heavy)]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]