site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1122
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Lark3po
Premium
join:2003-08-05
Madison, AL

Boo!

Damninit!


oroper
Patriots Rule

join:2004-06-01
Beverly, MA

said by Lark3po:

Damninit!
agreed.

Google failed me

RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11

What did google promise you?
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.



Lark3po
Premium
join:2003-08-05
Madison, AL

said by RadioDoc:

What did google promise you?
Where did he state google promised him something?

RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11

The claim is that google failed him.

Google is a very large commercial enterprise. I don't remember them promising anyone anything about this. Their "open access" ramblings were to their potential benefit, nobody else's.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.



Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:30

But they have to be nice. Their logo has colored letters in it.



gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall

join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA

1 edit

reply to Lark3po
I hope the FCC and Congress learned that they shouldn't allow one company to control the wireless spectrum, so that we can have competitive pricing and services.
Next auction they should deny previous winners from bidding.
--
There is no greater sign of a general decay of virtue in a nation, than a want of zeal in its inhabitants for the good of their country. ~ Joseph Addison


B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28

reply to Karl Bode
And on holidays it gets real purty.

-- B



en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

reply to gaforces
I agree. Companies with deep pockets can 'sit' on the spectrum for a while, unless they're pressed to deploy.
--
Canada = Hollywood North



NOCMan
MacChatter
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Colorado Springs, CO

reply to gaforces
So next auction AT&T will win the majority of the licenses? How does that benefit anyone.

Problem is because we have 2 competing technologies GSM\CDMA we see no direct competition. Plus since about 90% of the potential market is already locked up getting another company to step in is tantamount to telling them to go bankrupt trying.

You would have to offer a very lucrative offer to get any customers plus the network build out required would cost billions just to cover the top 20 markets.



gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall

join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA

1 edit

Just keep draining their cash with more and more auctions till they get the picture ...
It's not like theres a shortage of spectrum.



Dude
What Happens When I Do This
Premium
join:2000-11-20
Chicago, IL

reply to gaforces

said by gaforces:

I hope the FCC and Congress learned that they shouldn't allow one company to control the wireless spectrum, so that we can have competitive pricing and services.
Next auction they should deny previous winners from bidding.
agreed

but how this country is now i doubt it. its all about how much green you have and not about taking care of people

Wednesday, 30-May 22:36:47 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics