MOTO6809
join:2007-11-05
Springfield, MA
| reply to EPS
Re: Will they raise the monthly cap?
said by EPS  : (and of course cablecos and telcos will never lower prices) That's why customer service and overall satisfaction will be the deciding factor. |
|
Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
3 edits | reply to FIB3RTECH
Wrong. Telcos were soundly beating cable in new ads with their $15-$20 DSL offering despite slower speeds. And xDSL was a natural evolution that would have happened with or without cable. |
|
TuPaK
join:2002-07-21
San Gabriel, CA | reply to Dogfather
I've had friends with Cox tell me they have passed 0.5TB a month with zero problems. |
|
EPS
join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA | reply to FIB3RTECH
Exactly how competition is supposed to work- no one can sit on a single technology too long without either upgrading or lowering prices... (and of course cablecos and telcos will never lower prices) |
|
FIB3RTECH
@charter.com
| reply to Dogfather
said by Dogfather :Verizon has gotten a number of cable operators off their fat asses, namely CableVision, Comcrap, Cox and Time Warner who are directly responding to FiOS competition by ramping up speeds. Actually cable has gotten the Telco's off their @$$es. If it wasn't for the deployment of HFC networks in the late 80' and early 90's, you wouldn't see FiOS deployment today. |
|
Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
 ·Cox HSI
 ·Verizon FIOS
 ·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
 ·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP
| Meanwhile people keep complaining that FiOS competition hasn't brought down prices. There is more to competition than price and Verizon has gotten a number of cable operators off their fat asses, namely CableVision, Comcrap, Cox and Time Warner who are directly responding to FiOS competition by ramping up speeds. Time Warner raised speeds here to 15/2 shortly after FiOS was deployed, and they didn't do it 'cause they're nice guys. |
|
