 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | reply to RadioDoc
Re: rigged? said by RadioDoc:said by Matt:but in the case of the public spectrum, this was a most decidedly unfair auction and will not result in any new or innovative technology for the public as a whole. Please explain how this is "decidedly unfair". Every single one of these is for "public spectrum", and they are mandated by Congress. Did you read the auction documentation or are you just upset that Google played you? I could care less that about the whole Google fiasco. I'm upset that the system caters to the incumbents who have the most money. It doesn't allow for an upstart to win any valuable spectrum ... so the system is unfairly biased toward whomever has the deepest pockets. IN this case, Verizon and AT&T. Yet again. |
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | You probably don't understand bidding credits and bid multipliers.
Any startup wanting to get in on this could have.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
|
|
Reviews:
 ·Rapid Systems, I..
| reply to Matt
I think that a lot of people missed the fact that there was 3 large bidders, VZ,ATT, and Dish who walked away with the most in terms of total area coverage of the 700mhz auction.
What Dish/Echostar have planned for it no one knows but they did walk away with the most markets licences. But they do lack a few major markets that ATT and Verizon simply out bid on which were Boston, NYC, LA.. |
|
| The spectrum Echostar/Dish won is for one-way transmission.... |
|
EPS
join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA | reply to Matt
There's a big issue for any startup- they can't use this spectrum at all until next year, but they'd have to pay for it right now- a down payment within ten days, and the full balance within twenty... Honestly, that part of the auction seems the most biased against startup wireless companies to me. |
|
| AT&T dropped a cool billion in down payment today... |
|
| reply to Matt
silly. They won't give it to some a financially weak upstart company because that company does not have the financial resources to build a network. All some upstart would do is sell the frequencies to another company at an inflated price. |
|
 DavidI have a son- d3Premium,VIP
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL
kudos:68
·AT&T Southwest
 ·DIRECTV
·AT&T Midwest
 ·Google Voice
| at almost $600 a share of stock are they really that financially weak? They could have built a small start-up network called it a beta like they call everything else and the public would have been happy cause it's google!
And the good thing is, that it would be beta, which means people would put up with the problems and not complain because "It's google!, and it's Beta!" |
|
