RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | So let me get this straight... The FCC reallocates the UHF TV band, moves television stations to below 700 MHz, and then Echostar bids on a part of it for...
...television.
What is wrong with this picture?
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
|
|
EPS
join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA | Well, it was the FCC, not Echostar, that created a block useful only for one-way services... |
|
| reply to RadioDoc
yeah I'm glad I'm not alone in being amused by that. |
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
1 edit | reply to EPS
They are useful for more than just one-way depending on what you want to do. Don't blindly believe what pundits pund. I would imagine that someone could figure out something more useful to do with 6 MHz at 722 MHz than making it back into TV channel 56.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
EPS
join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA | Hm, I don't know much about wireless broadcasting, I just made the assumption based on the fact that block E only held one block of spectrum, while all others included two... though I suppose Video on Demand would require at least some of that to be set aside for upstream, so they can tell what video it is you are demanding... |
|
PDXPLT
join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR | reply to RadioDoc
Yea, "analysts" are mostly clueless; paid to say something about some company every once in awhile in order to churn the companies' stock, and generate commissions ofr their employers/clients.
Maybe Dish wants it for a return channel. They have plenty of downstream bandwidth. They could do one-way satellite broadband. Latency would be much improved compared with Wildblue and Direcway. |
|
macaholicPremium
join:2003-08-31
Jackson Heights, NY
1 edit | reply to RadioDoc
perhaps an effort to promote an infant technology that has promise with some chance for refinement..
edit: and hopefully not crappy small tube tv..... bleeeh.
--
"You don't subject minority rights to a referendum." Justice Minister Irwin Cotler of Canada |
|
