<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Can something like this work for Uverse and FIOS in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20207970</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:18:02 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:18:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Can something like this work for Uverse and FIOS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20220611</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1172439"><b>xsiddalx</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  EPS <A HREF="/useremail/u/1528955"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Hm, good point- FiOS works the same as cable, but U-Verse is true IPTV and I suppose should be considered a data service (no matter how much one hates "the new" at&t)<br> </div>Can I get my TV anywhere I have an internet connection?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20220611</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:36:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can something like this work for Uverse and FIOS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20220541</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1172439"><b>xsiddalx</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  odreian615 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1315394"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I mean they are only sending data so franchise laws should not apply ?<br>Right?<br> </div>ATT, Ed Whitacre, had been making this argument, yet they are slowly moving forward without challenging it in court. If it were cheaper for the Bells to proceed under the IPTV they would have already sued their way through.<br><br>Heck, isn't our telephone call data? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20220541</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:16:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can something like this work for Uverse and FIOS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20208986</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1491176"><b>zed260</b></A> : cable phone regulation<br><br>heck cable and phone are both becoming more and more a like whats the difference <br><br>what we need is new legislation bring it all under one  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20208986</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:49:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can something like this work for Uverse and FIOS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20208291</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1528955"><b>EPS</b></A> : Well, if you're declaring VoIP, which is intended to provide phone-type service, to be not phone, then it seems like a precedent is set to exclude IPTV from cable regulation... though cable regulation and phone regulation are two very different animals.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20208291</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:25:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can something like this work for Uverse and FIOS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20208183</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/823721"><b>PhoenixDown</b></A> : Is the determination made by the intention of the service (tv, phone, etc) or the medium it is delivered by (IP, COAX, Fiber)?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20208183</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:58:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can something like this work for Uverse and FIOS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20208011</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1528955"><b>EPS</b></A> : Hm, good point- FiOS works the same as cable, but U-Verse is true IPTV and I suppose should be considered a data service (no matter how much one hates "the new" at&t)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20208011</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:23:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Can something like this work for Uverse and FIOS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20207970</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1315394"><b>odreian615</b></A> : I mean they are only sending data so franchise laws should not apply ?<br>Right?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20207970</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:12:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
