republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Steal Wi-Fi In Maryland? Face 3 Year Prison Stretch » Seems defendable in many cases
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
6
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Stupidity... »
« Interesting...  
AuthorAll Replies


EGeezer
Summer is passing
Premium
join:2002-08-04
Country!
·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T CallVantage


edit:
March 22nd, @07:42PM

Seems defendable in many cases

said by »mlis.state.md.us/2008rs/billfile/hb1377.htm :

Synopsis:

Prohibiting a person from intentionally, willfully, and without authorization accessing, attempting to access, causing to be accessed, or exceeding the person's authorized access to wireless Internet service with knowledge that the access is unauthorized and prohibited by law; etc.
and

(c) (1) A person may not intentionally, willfully, and without authorization access, attempt to access, cause to be accessed, or exceed the person’s authorized access to all or part of a computer network, computer control language, computer, computer software, computer system, computer services, or computer database.
Kinda seems like "intentionally, willfully" is a key phrase. There seem to be lots of people who think it's OK to leave their access open, or that they believe in sharing connections.

According to the law as cited, the plaintiff would have to show

1) the network owner didn't want the network used by any other than certain people.

2) The person accessing the network knew or reasonably believed that the network was restricted and not a gesture of "free access" by the owner.

If the wireless is, for example, a Linksys WRT54G(or GS), the manual's installation instructions and the install/configure CD clearly and explicitly step the user through securing the wireless and router admin access. It would be reasonable to expect that if a WRT54GS is "open", the user intends for it to be open.

On a side note, it's interesting that a guy who beats up his wife usually gets a few days to a few months in the pokey and someone who drives drunk and injures someone usually gets a few months in jail. I'm not necessarily saying to lower the wifi stealing penalty, but maybe they should raise the effective penalties for other actions.
--
Mayors of New York come from nowhere and go nowhere.
Wallace Sayre (apparently, so do governors... )
-
Forums » Steal Wi-Fi In Maryland? Face 3 Year Prison StretchStupidity... »
« Interesting...  


Friday, 29-Aug 15:56:52 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [317] Comcast 250GB Cap Goes Live October 1
· [222] FBI To Allow Warrantless Investigations
· [129] AT&T Thanks Democrats For Telecom Immunity
· [123] Time Warner Cable Cripples TiVO, Gets FCC Fine
· [118] Why Run FTTH When You Can Pretend You Do?
· [108] Industry Reacts To Comcast Cap Plans
· [67] Telus CAPS 'Unlimited' EVDO Data Plans
· [64] Game Publishers Follow The RIAA's Lead
· [60] Qwest Defends Not Running FTTH
· [54] Dish First To Be All MPEG-4
Most people now reading
· [iPhone] Did I Buy A Fake iPhone? [All things Macintosh]
· Comcast has new Acceptable Use Policy besides the 250GB cap [Comcast HSI]
· Harley Davidson bikes should be banned [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· [Rant] Electricity prices [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· IMG 1.6 Deployment [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Comcast + Olympics = Termination? [Comcast HSI]