republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » NY May Cut Spitzer’s Broadband Plan » Taxes
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Cut welfare spending »
« useless  
AuthorAll Replies

jc100

join:2002-04-10
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to pnh102
Re: Taxes

PNH,

Sigh. You're wrong but hey let's for the sake of it just pretend you're right. You rarely if ever are, but since this will turn into another round robin, I concede. States haven't had funds cut as the Federal Government re-allocates their money. The Federal Government hasn't squandered money in record numbers either overseas. States haven't had to cut programs due to smaller budgets. It's all made up and a figment of our imaginations. Obviously, inflation and rising prices don't factor into the process either. Ten dollars now isn't the same as twenty years ago. But hey, I'm 100 percent wrong. Make you happy? Probably, since the truth and facts aren't in your vocabulary. Therefore, I'll just write what you want to hear. You wouldn't care to google anyway or read what I researched so I won't bother replying again.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

said by jc100 See Profile :

States haven't had to cut programs due to smaller budgets. It's all made up and a figment of our imaginations.
Well let's look at Maryland as an example. When the new governor took office in 2007, the state was actually running a $500 million budget surplus. What does our governor decide to do? He submits a budget that contains nearly $2 billion in new spending and the legislature raises taxes bu $1.3 billion.

Was the new spending really needed? Maryland seemed to be getting along just fine without it. If times are so "tough" then why wasn't a more austere budget proposed instead? Perhaps Maryland could have cut its budget, as you claim many other states have had to do, to deal with the alleged "shortfall."
--
This isn't fair! I was only supposed to hate just ONE presidential candidate!

jc100

join:2002-04-10
·RoadRunner Cable

Smiles and Nods over and over in a patronizing manner.... and of course one isolated state and their mismanagement speaks for the other 49, right? If you bothered to read my post, I believe the federal government should only tax 1-2 percent with it ONLY being allowed on defense, trade, and printing money. The rest of the money SHOULD stay within the state and if they mismanage it, tough luck. No one should bail them out. It's their citizens job to elect responsible people and hold bad officials accountable. I don't justify Maryland's bad actions but on the same breath, its only ONE state out of 49. With that said, look at my chart of WHO RECEIVES the MOST federal dollars. RED STATES (Republican) who claim to be the fiscally conservative, with the south being the MAJORITY. Thereby, they pay the least but receive the most!! My point stands, look at places like California and New York and compare their spending to dollars received. It's no wonder they have cutbacks. They get less than a dollar for every one they stick into the pot.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

said by jc100 See Profile :

Smiles and Nods over and over in a patronizing manner.... and of course one isolated state and their mismanagement speaks for the other 49, right?
Actually, yes. You can go find for yourself that state spending has increased at a rate opposite freefall in the past 15 years.
said by jc100 See Profile :

If you bothered to read my post ...
I did, it was incorrect.
--
This isn't fair! I was only supposed to hate just ONE presidential candidate!

jc100

join:2002-04-10
·RoadRunner Cable


edit:
March 25th, @06:15AM

Whether or not state spending has increased is a different matter. The question you FIRST POSED and now are backtracking on is whether or not states are in financial debt. You offered me ONE ISOLATED example. I then proceeded to explain how your stance is wrong. Now as for increased state spending, um YA, it will be more every year. It's called INFLATION. Prices rise and things go up in price. The same services that once cost x amount now cost Y. So 10 dollars five years ago might take 15 dollars now. It doesn't mean the states are being irresonsible, it just means they have two choices. 1) Make cut backs to afford the same service 2) raise taxes. It's called common sense.
Forums » NY May Cut Spitzer’s Broadband PlanCut welfare spending »
« useless  


Tuesday, 02-Dec 15:54:43 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [109] AT&T Metered Billing Trial Hits Second Market
· [82] UDP BitTorrent Will Destroy The Interwebs!
· [60] EFF Challenges Telecom Immunity
· [59] Comcast Tries To Slow Verizon's Philly Entry
· [32] Cablevision Bumps HD Count To 68
· [22] Hawaii Telecom Files For Bankruptcy
· [22] Mega-ISPs, Consumer Advocates Demand Broadband Plan
· [19] Verizon Tops Consumer Reports Wireless Satisfaction Ratings
· [17] FCC To Vote On Free National Wireless Broadband
· [15] Clearwire May Slow WiMax Build
Most people now reading
· [Rant] Bestbuy receipt checker [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· Is this a good thing for the net? [news,99366]
· Coalition Government Possible? [TekSavvy]
· [WotLK] New Hunter Macros [World of Warcraft]
· Ted Rogers passed away [Rogers]
· Notice, new uTorrent Alpha may be able to evade throttling [TekSavvy]
· Basic 500 Price Increase! [Vonage]
· Upgrade from 768kbps/128kbps to 1Mbps/386kbps? [Verizon Online DSL]
· Routing problem? [OptimumOnline]