<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Incorrect facts in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20217694</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:07:15 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:07:15 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Incorrect facts</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20217795</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><b>Matt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Karl Bode <A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote">The statement that working devices utilizing spectrum sensing have not been presented to the FCC is false.</div>Good thing nobody made that statement, then!<br><br>The first prototype failed to detect and avoid nearby signal, this latest suffered from a power supply failure -- though maybe it subsequently performed ok -- nobody knows because the final results haven't been announced...<br> </div>I believe Microsoft is claiming that the FCC failed to test the backup unit after the primary experienced a hardware failure.<br><br>Microsoft is claiming that their tests prove the devices work and the FCC has signed off on the methodology used to test the effectiveness of the devices.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20217795</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:30:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Incorrect facts</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20217694</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><b>Karl Bode</b></A> : <div class="bquote">The statement that working devices utilizing spectrum sensing have not been presented to the FCC is false.</div>Good thing nobody made that statement, then! :)<br><br>The first prototype failed to detect and avoid nearby signal, this latest suffered from a power supply failure -- though maybe it subsequently performed ok -- nobody knows because the final results haven't been announced...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20217694</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:09:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Incorrect facts</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20217664</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : The statement that working devices utilizing spectrum sensing have not been presented to the FCC is false. That a power supply fails does not create interference.<br><br>In any event, these are "prototypes" of the spectrum sensing approach desigend to help set technical standards.  This is not device certification. <br><br>Geolocation, as proposed by Google today, is a separate approach than spectrum sensing that can eliminate any interference with some additional overhead. Spectrum sensing is used today in WiFi and it works.  <br><br>New America notes that 90% of wireless microphones are used illegally.  These new approaches are a way for the wireless microphone industry to "get legal".<br><br>Get the facts. Then write.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20217664</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:03:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
