Search:  

 
theme to white backgroundlet page decide theme
HomeFind ServiceReviewsISP NewsFAQsForumsToolsDatabaseAbout 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Sprint Looking At Unified Core Network » AT&T & Verizon probably do the same thing or will
Search Topic:
 Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« The hard part is the back end infrastructure ties...  
AuthorAll Replies

BosstonesOwn

join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
clubs:
·Comcast

reply to TKJunkMail
Re: AT&T & Verizon probably do the same thing or will

Verizon Wireless has been doing this for years. They mux the Verizon wireless traffic onto the Verizon backbone.

Funny thing is that this is how Verizon makes a lot of their profit, they double dip. VW is a holding of V so they bill for the network capacity then they take a chunk of the profit as well. Pretty good gig.
--
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"
to forum · permalink · · 2008-03-24 20:52:55 · Reply to this


tc1uscg

join:2005-03-09
Saint Clair Shores, MI
said by BosstonesOwn See Profile :

Verizon Wireless has been doing this for years. They mux the Verizon wireless traffic onto the Verizon backbone.

Funny thing is that this is how Verizon makes a lot of their profit, they double dip. VW is a holding of V so they bill for the network capacity then they take a chunk of the profit as well. Pretty good gig.
That's not what they are talking about. ALL telco's "mux" their different levels of communications. Sprint has iDen MSO's jumping on MAN fiber to a LD site, which lets the T1's trickle down to whatever backbone that's needed. What VZ/VZW isn't doing (or saying) is offloading traffic from legacy switches, like a Nortel DMS and/or Lucent platform and putting it all on a single platform (ip based) so it all forms one cloud.. not many. It's nice to have 1 cabinet (mux's, echo cans, WBDac's and BBDacs) that has everything one needs instead of a plant scattered all over the building.
to forum · permalink · · 2008-03-25 02:01:54 · Reply to this

BosstonesOwn

join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
clubs:		 Ahh I didn't get what they meant.

Have to stamp the burnt out logo on my head for it.
to forum · permalink · · 2008-03-25 11:19:44 · Reply to this
Forums » Sprint Looking At Unified Core Network« The hard part is the back end infrastructure ties...  

Thursday, 10-Dec 13:28:14 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [131] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [75] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [68] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [45] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
Most people now reading
· [WIN7] Well, I was dumb, but do I have recourse? [Microsoft Help]
· Will Gearscore die now? [World of Warcraft]
· New Mediacom Email [Mediacom]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· malware has been found hidden inside an Ubuntu screensaver [Security]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Icecrown 5-man strats [World of Warcraft]
· ICC10 [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]