www.broadbandreports.com
  republican-creole
Search:  

 
   AllHot TopicsCable SupportTelco SupportHardware etcSecurityClubsGallery»»






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Cable: Verizon Being Sleazy In VoIP Battle » Verizon makes a good point
 
Search Topic:
  Social:
topic feed
 toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Windstream (Valor) did this shit too.  
AuthorAll Replies

xsiddalx

join:2005-03-11
Chicago, IL
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service

reply to jester121
Re: Verizon makes a good point

said by jester121 See Profile :

No, Verizon is comparing apples and oranges.

If a customer transfers their Comcast Digital Voice (or whatever it's called now) to Verizon they follow the exact same porting process in reverse.

Porting regulations aren't applicable to TV service. Remember, the point of this law was for the good of consumers -- switching carriers doesn't mean losing your phone number. There's nothing of the sort in television, whether satellite, cable, Uverse, or FIOS.
Don't forget to add Comcast Digital Phone or any other VOIP type offering. Voip providers aren't allowed to port numbers. Comcast Digital Phone is supposed to be dead by April something or other, then they may or may not be telephone companies with porting requirements.

jester121

join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL
·ViaTalk

said by xsiddalx See Profile :

Don't forget to add Comcast Digital Phone or any other VOIP type offering. Voip providers aren't allowed to port numbers. Comcast Digital Phone is supposed to be dead by April something or other, then they may or may not be telephone companies with porting requirements.
???

Vonage, Viatalk, and all the rest will be interested to hear that they can't port numbers -- they've both ported my SBC number, as did Sunrocket. Although, technically, I guess you could say it's whoever they're purchasing PSTN access from that's handling the port.


MadMANN
Premium
join:2005-08-19
·Comcast

reply to xsiddalx
said by xsiddalx See Profile :

Voip providers aren't allowed to port numbers.
Inaccurate. Most do it all of the time, as long as the customer lives in the same area where the prefix can apply.

As far as the news story goes, I don't feel that giving a provider one last chance to retain a customer is so off the wall. However, being in the industry, I can tell you that many illegal tactics are used during the porting process by many ILECs. I have seen ports delayed further than the legal time frame in hopes of frustrating the customer into staying where they are and giving the appearance that the new provider can't get the job done. This is most useful when a customer is getting a triple play and the company either has to make 2 trips or delay the entire install. In that case, they not only affect the phone service and screws with the TV/'net install in the process.
Forums » Cable: Verizon Being Sleazy In VoIP Battle« Windstream (Valor) did this shit too.  

Most commented news this week
· [154] Comcast Van Race Injures 3-Year-Old
· [100] EA Scales Back 'Internet Required' DRM
· [82] Sprint Hemorrhaging Wireless Subscribers
· [75] ISPs To Start Booting More P2P Users
· [75] Mozilla Considering Opt-In Browsing Tracking
· [70] Canadian Regulators Deny Relief For Bell Canada Traffic Shaping
· [58] Baby Bell Neglect of Vanilla DSL Could Spell Trouble
· [54] Missouri University Makes Kids Take Copyright Quiz To Use P2P
· [52] An Inside Look At RIAA DMCA Letter Generation
· [48] Verizon: Stop Yer Broadband Bellyachin'
Saturday, 17-May
21:39:02
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
8th year online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF