republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Cable: Verizon Being Sleazy In VoIP Battle » Verizon makes a good point
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

xsiddalx

join:2005-03-11
Chicago, IL
·AT&T Yahoo

reply to jester121
Re: Verizon makes a good point

said by jester121 See Profile :

No, Verizon is comparing apples and oranges.

If a customer transfers their Comcast Digital Voice (or whatever it's called now) to Verizon they follow the exact same porting process in reverse.

Porting regulations aren't applicable to TV service. Remember, the point of this law was for the good of consumers -- switching carriers doesn't mean losing your phone number. There's nothing of the sort in television, whether satellite, cable, Uverse, or FIOS.
Don't forget to add Comcast Digital Phone or any other VOIP type offering. Voip providers aren't allowed to port numbers. Comcast Digital Phone is supposed to be dead by April something or other, then they may or may not be telephone companies with porting requirements.

jester121

join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL
·surpasshosting
·ViaTalk

said by xsiddalx See Profile :

Don't forget to add Comcast Digital Phone or any other VOIP type offering. Voip providers aren't allowed to port numbers. Comcast Digital Phone is supposed to be dead by April something or other, then they may or may not be telephone companies with porting requirements.
???

Vonage, Viatalk, and all the rest will be interested to hear that they can't port numbers -- they've both ported my SBC number, as did Sunrocket. Although, technically, I guess you could say it's whoever they're purchasing PSTN access from that's handling the port.


MadMANN
Premium
join:2005-08-19
·Comcast

reply to xsiddalx
said by xsiddalx See Profile :

Voip providers aren't allowed to port numbers.
Inaccurate. Most do it all of the time, as long as the customer lives in the same area where the prefix can apply.

As far as the news story goes, I don't feel that giving a provider one last chance to retain a customer is so off the wall. However, being in the industry, I can tell you that many illegal tactics are used during the porting process by many ILECs. I have seen ports delayed further than the legal time frame in hopes of frustrating the customer into staying where they are and giving the appearance that the new provider can't get the job done. This is most useful when a customer is getting a triple play and the company either has to make 2 trips or delay the entire install. In that case, they not only affect the phone service and screws with the TV/'net install in the process.
Forums » Cable: Verizon Being Sleazy In VoIP Battle


Monday, 09-Nov 18:36:41 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [65] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [49] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [31] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [15] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [12] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [9] 15 States Have Now Gotten Broadband Mapping Money
· [5] AT&T Launching New 7.2 Mbps 3G Modem
Most people now reading
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· Divorce advice... [General Questions]
· Google Has Acquired Gizmo5 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· How in the world am I going to get into college? [General Questions]
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]
· Blown out Ballasts [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Is Gear Score now the new requirement to get pug invite? [World of Warcraft]
· 60 Minutes piece on cyber security last night [Security]
· [WotLK] Shaman tier 10 is out [World of Warcraft]
· [SU] Apple Releases Mac OS X 10.6.2 [All Things Macintosh]