Search:  

 
theme to black backgroundlet page decide theme
HomeFind ServiceReviewsISP NewsFAQsForumsToolsDatabaseAbout 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » WiMax Critic Gets Blowback » Too close for comfort?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
33		 Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
New $3b deal in process for a XOHM JV »
« Fixed vs. Mobile  
AuthorAll Replies


rawgerz
In Debt we trust
Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA
·Verizon Online DSL
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Too close for comfort?

2.5Ghz is a little too close to the ISM band (2.4Ghz) to me. Consumer devices don't always stay in spec and can bleed over to higher channels.
I wouldn't be surprised if something as simple as a microwave caused interference for someone using this equipment.

2.5 is still high as far as penetration is concerned. Maybe if they can implement high sensitivity radios (-90dBm) it would be worthwhile.
--

You can't make all the people happy all of the time. But it should be common sense to shoot for the majority.
to forum · permalink · · 2008-03-25 14:50:28 · Reply to this


rf_engineer

join:2003-08-04
USA
said by rawgerz See Profile :

2.5Ghz is a little too close to the ISM band (2.4Ghz) to me. Consumer devices don't always stay in spec and can bleed over to higher channels.
I wouldn't be surprised if something as simple as a microwave caused interference for someone using this equipment.

2.5 is still high as far as penetration is concerned. Maybe if they can implement high sensitivity radios (-90dBm) it would be worthwhile.
-90dBm is very doable, it's all a matter of how many bits/second you're pumping through at what modulation.

On interference from 2.4 Ghz, I would think this interference would be very localized and would affect only the subscriber and not cause system-wide problems.
to forum · permalink · · 2008-03-25 19:21:06 · Reply to this


rawgerz
In Debt we trust
Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA
·Verizon Online DSL
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

 That's what I meant. Who knows how many potential subscribers have a device polluting the 2.45Ghz range and up in their house with the range of baby monitors, cordless phones, cheap microwaves, bluetooth, routers, etc. available.

They won't do any homework and instead blame the technology and or provider for a localized problem.
--

You can't make all the people happy all of the time. But it should be common sense to shoot for the majority.
to forum · permalink · · 2008-03-25 19:49:24 · Reply to this
Forums » WiMax Critic Gets BlowbackNew $3b deal in process for a XOHM JV »
« Fixed vs. Mobile  

Sunday, 08-Nov 15:28:23 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [108] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [92] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [82] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [76] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· Hit and run [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· NO ONE knows what's wrong with my line! [TekSavvy]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· [NFL] Week 9 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· [Need Info] Looking for backup software... [Software]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [ Classes] Druid tanking: rotation and glyphs [World of Warcraft]