Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » WiMax Critic Gets Blowback » Too close for comfort?
Uniqs:
46
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
New $3b deal in process for a XOHM JV »
« Fixed vs. Mobile  

rawgerz
In Debt we trust
Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA
·Verizon Online DSL
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Too close for comfort?

2.5Ghz is a little too close to the ISM band (2.4Ghz) to me. Consumer devices don't always stay in spec and can bleed over to higher channels.
I wouldn't be surprised if something as simple as a microwave caused interference for someone using this equipment.

2.5 is still high as far as penetration is concerned. Maybe if they can implement high sensitivity radios (-90dBm) it would be worthwhile.
--

You can't make all the people happy all of the time. But it should be common sense to shoot for the majority.

rf_engineer

join:2003-08-04
USA

Re: Too close for comfort?

said by rawgerz See Profile :

2.5Ghz is a little too close to the ISM band (2.4Ghz) to me. Consumer devices don't always stay in spec and can bleed over to higher channels.
I wouldn't be surprised if something as simple as a microwave caused interference for someone using this equipment.

2.5 is still high as far as penetration is concerned. Maybe if they can implement high sensitivity radios (-90dBm) it would be worthwhile.
-90dBm is very doable, it's all a matter of how many bits/second you're pumping through at what modulation.

On interference from 2.4 Ghz, I would think this interference would be very localized and would affect only the subscriber and not cause system-wide problems.

rawgerz
In Debt we trust
Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA
·Verizon Online DSL
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: Too close for comfort?

That's what I meant. Who knows how many potential subscribers have a device polluting the 2.45Ghz range and up in their house with the range of baby monitors, cordless phones, cheap microwaves, bluetooth, routers, etc. available.

They won't do any homework and instead blame the technology and or provider for a localized problem.
--

You can't make all the people happy all of the time. But it should be common sense to shoot for the majority.
Forums » WiMax Critic Gets BlowbackNew $3b deal in process for a XOHM JV »
« Fixed vs. Mobile  


Sunday, 06-Dec 10:57:44 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [128] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [105] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [82] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [81] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [75] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Problems with rlslog.net? [TekSavvy]
· Is there any true cure for, or way to prevent, a hangover? [General Questions]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· How fast is your upstream internet connection? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· DIR:655 - Virtual Server broadcast address in 1.31 [D-Link]
· [DNS] Google's public DNS... performance increases? [Comcast HSI]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]