Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » WiMax Critic Gets Blowback » Too close for comfort?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
48
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
New $3b deal in process for a XOHM JV »
« Fixed vs. Mobile  
AuthorAll Replies


rawgerz
In Debt we trust
Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA
·Verizon Online DSL
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

reply to rf_engineer
Re: Too close for comfort?

That's what I meant. Who knows how many potential subscribers have a device polluting the 2.45Ghz range and up in their house with the range of baby monitors, cordless phones, cheap microwaves, bluetooth, routers, etc. available.

They won't do any homework and instead blame the technology and or provider for a localized problem.
--

You can't make all the people happy all of the time. But it should be common sense to shoot for the majority.


rf_engineer

join:2003-08-04
USA

reply to rawgerz
said by rawgerz See Profile :

2.5Ghz is a little too close to the ISM band (2.4Ghz) to me. Consumer devices don't always stay in spec and can bleed over to higher channels.
I wouldn't be surprised if something as simple as a microwave caused interference for someone using this equipment.

2.5 is still high as far as penetration is concerned. Maybe if they can implement high sensitivity radios (-90dBm) it would be worthwhile.
-90dBm is very doable, it's all a matter of how many bits/second you're pumping through at what modulation.

On interference from 2.4 Ghz, I would think this interference would be very localized and would affect only the subscriber and not cause system-wide problems.


rawgerz
In Debt we trust
Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA
·Verizon Online DSL
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

2.5Ghz is a little too close to the ISM band (2.4Ghz) to me. Consumer devices don't always stay in spec and can bleed over to higher channels.
I wouldn't be surprised if something as simple as a microwave caused interference for someone using this equipment.

2.5 is still high as far as penetration is concerned. Maybe if they can implement high sensitivity radios (-90dBm) it would be worthwhile.
--

You can't make all the people happy all of the time. But it should be common sense to shoot for the majority.
Forums » WiMax Critic Gets BlowbackNew $3b deal in process for a XOHM JV »
« Fixed vs. Mobile  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 12:30:50 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [65] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [61] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [57] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
Most people now reading
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· New PvE Content [World of Warcraft]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Comcast Customers: Would You Prefer Metered Billing? [Comcast HSI]
· Buzzing whatchamacallit in ceiling...?? Help identify. [Home Repair & Improvement]
· HOA Headaches [General Questions]
· [Gold] Making a Killing on Patch Day [World of Warcraft]